From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Allan Webber Subject: Re: Add guile-config Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 11:47:26 -0800 Message-ID: <87y4alsqlt.fsf@dustycloud.org> References: <87h9haw654.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38839) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVP7N-0004QL-CX for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:47:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVP7I-0000mP-Dp for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:47:33 -0500 Received: from dustycloud.org ([50.116.34.160]:38958) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVP7I-0000m1-9M for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:47:28 -0500 In-reply-to: <87h9haw654.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: alex.sassmannshausen@gmail.com Cc: "guix-devel@gnu.org" Alex Sassmannshausen writes: > Hello, > > Attached you should find a working patch for guile-config, a library for > Guile that should make maintaining command-line options and > configuration files for your scripts/programs easier. > > I'm preparing a 0.1 Release announcement for this project too. > > I ran it through `guix lint` and it seemed to be fine, but let me know > if you have any comments! > > Best wishes, > Alex I tried building and testing it: Starting download of /gnu/store/gq2zz95zmmsjkpn7lbwfbna8m4hr56r7-guile-config-0.1.tar.gz >From http://alex.pompo.co/software/guile-config-0.1.tar.gz... guile-config-0.1.tar.gz 332KiB 100KiB/s 00:03 [####################] 100.0% output path `/gnu/store/gq2zz95zmmsjkpn7lbwfbna8m4hr56r7-guile-config-0.1.tar.gz' should have sha256 hash `1yk4xmwp4rl9ral02igppfh9dh4l97k2kmgpkqhy3znjir004v8z', instead has `0fcj2d91z7nhm9k79zkc826l8i06khqvp3d641wik9s3hv6qjya2' So I guess unless I'm being MITM'ed or some other error (I verified that's the hash I'm seeing with "guix hash" after a wget), it looks like that hash is wrong? - Chris