From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Update btrfs-progs once again and add static output Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 23:00:10 +0200 Message-ID: <87y48esi3p.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1459603774-9455-1-git-send-email-tobias.geerinckx.rice@gmail.com> <20160412000709.GB11228@jasmine> <20160412071344.GA15113@jasmine> <878u0gnof9.fsf@gnu.org> <20160415013417.GA3756@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34553) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1arAqv-0000D3-Lm for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 17:00:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1arAqr-0006W5-Tp for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 17:00:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160415013417.GA3756@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Thu, 14 Apr 2016 21:34:17 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari skribis: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 06:30:18PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> Leo Famulari skribis: >>=20 >> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 08:07:09PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: >> >> On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 03:29:31PM +0200, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: >> >> > Some simple patches to add a =E2=80=98static=E2=80=99 output to the= btrfs-progs >> >> > package, containing statically linked versions of all the tools. >> >>=20 >> >> I've applied your patches (with some very minor edits to the commit >> >> messages), bringing HEAD to 5f3f3ac2874. >> > >> > I forgot to check how many packages would be rebuilt by the change to >> > util-linux: 714. >> > >> > Should I revert the change and put it on core-updates? >>=20 >> That would have been the way to go, yes. > > Okay, thanks to Dave and Mark for doing the necessary reversions. > > Hopefully I won't forget to check this again, but if I do it would be > good for me to know what happens when changes are pushed the master > branch on Savannah. > > Does hydra start building the changes immediately? If so, and I had > reverted the change, would that have stopped the ongoing build? Hydra picks up the changes =E2=80=9Cafter some time=E2=80=9D, it basically = polls the Git repo (though nowadays we often disable automatic polling to reduce load on the server=E2=80=A6) =E2=80=9CObsolete=E2=80=9D builds that are queued have to be stopped explic= itly through the web interface at hydra.gnu.org by one of the authorized people (currently one of Mark, Andreas, or myself.) HTH! Ludo=E2=80=99.