From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Kost Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add gparted. Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 22:15:18 +0300 Message-ID: <87y46uyoxl.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87shx2xjrj.fsf@gnu.org> <20160528161855.GC16585@jasmine> <87r3cmxc9g.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59537) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b6jhh-0004Fh-T0 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 May 2016 15:15:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b6jhd-0004PM-Lo for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 May 2016 15:15:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87r3cmxc9g.fsf@gnu.org> (Roel Janssen's message of "Sat, 28 May 2016 20:34:19 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Roel Janssen Cc: guix-devel Roel Janssen (2016-05-28 21:34 +0300) wrote: > Hello Leo, > > Thank you for your quick response. > > Leo Famulari writes: > >> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 05:52:16PM +0200, Roel Janssen wrote: >>> Dear Guix, >>> >>> I wonder if my ChangeLog-format commit message is OK this way. >> >> How about wording it as in bf50f7b5870? I don't think it's necessary to >> list the affected packages if it applies to the entire module. > > Right. I had looked for a similar change but could not find one. > Thanks for pointing this one out. > > Would it perhaps be better if I split the license prefix changes and > the addition of gparted in two separate patches? Yes, these are 2 different things, so separating them would be the best, I think. -- Alex