From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John J Foerch Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add di. Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 23:47:05 -0400 Message-ID: <87y45i83pi.fsf@hecubus.retroj.net> References: <87poqvam4v.fsf@hecubus.retroj.net> <20160703210212.GA22355@jasmine> <87eg7a9y7e.fsf@hecubus.retroj.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58107) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bJuqt-0002Eg-Ez for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2016 23:47:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bJuqp-0008D3-Dh for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2016 23:47:19 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:44595) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bJuqp-0008Cy-6b for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2016 23:47:15 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bJuql-00005n-Dw for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2016 05:47:11 +0200 Received: from 152.160.144.141 ([152.160.144.141]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 04 Jul 2016 05:47:11 +0200 Received: from jjfoerch by 152.160.144.141 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 04 Jul 2016 05:47:11 +0200 List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org John J Foerch writes: > Leo Famulari writes: > >> On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 03:13:52PM -0400, John J Foerch wrote: >>> * gnu/packages/admin.scm (di): New variable. >> >> Thanks! >> >>> + (arguments >>> + `(#:phases >>> + (modify-phases %standard-phases >>> + (delete 'configure) >>> + (delete 'check) >> >> Did you try setting `#:test-target "test"` in the arguments? The >> Makefile has a test target. >> > > I didn't know about that. I'll try it out. > A test relating to an included perl module Filesys::di fails. I hadn't intended to include that module in the package, as all I'm interested in is the 'di' binary. Given that, I would suggest that we bypass the tests. -- John Foerch