From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Gs
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 11:43:04 +0200
Message-ID: <87y44qoxxz.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20160722220501.GA6445@solar> <87twfgmxas.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20160723145220.GA7008@solar>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53210)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1bRcPo-0004G2-SO
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 05:43:13 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1bRcPk-0003Su-L5
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 05:43:11 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20160723145220.GA7008@solar> (Andreas Enge's message of "Sat, 23
	Jul 2016 16:52:20 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

=C2=A1Hola!

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

> On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 01:03:07PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
>> For the current solution (avoiding a full rebuild), see commit
>> 61dc82d9b90d0545739c30bfc33003bd062071f0.  LilyPond could hard-code the
>> file name of =E2=80=98gsc=E2=80=99.
>
> This looks like too much work to implement for each package separately.
> And as a permanent solution, I do not like it.
>
>> Alternately, we could provide a wrapper containing a =E2=80=98gs=E2=80=
=99 symlink.
>
> This would be one option. Or we could add another package, corresponding
> to the previous definition, that we would use only as an input to the
> packages in core-updates that do not build right now. This solution could
> be implemented using copy-paste and not take much time. I would then also
> remove the ad-hoc lilypond patching.

I went ahead and pushed these two commits, which seem to address the
issue:

  d8eb912 * gnu: Use 'ghostscript-gs' in packages that need the 'gs' comman=
d.
  71eba3e * gnu: Add 'ghostscript-gs' and 'ghostscript-gs-with-x'.

> Then after core-updates is merged, we could add the gs->gsc link to our
> ghostscript packages.

Yes, we should do that afterwards.

Apologies for the breakage!

Ludo'.