Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix IBus input methods.

[ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)]

Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de> skribis:

> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> skribis:
>>
>>> 宋文武 <iyzsong@member.fsf.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
>>>>
>>>>>   gnu: gtk+-2: Add patch to support GUIX_GTK2_IM_MODULE_FILE.
>>>>>   gnu: gtk+: Add patch to support GUIX_GTK3_IM_MODULE_FILE.
>>>>
>>>> Look good to me!
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> What do you think: should this be a separate branch (e.g. “gtk-rebuild”)
>>> or should it be pushed to “core-updates”?
>>
>> As discussed on IRC, I’ve added a “jobset”:
>>
>>   https://hydra.gnu.org/jobset/gnu/gtk-im-modules
>>
>> There seems to be only 1 new failure compared to ‘master’:
>>
>>   https://hydra.gnu.org/eval/109124?compare=master#tabs-now-fail
>>
>> Could you take a look?
>
> This looks unrelated to me.

OK.

>> We’ll have to merge ‘master’ into it and evaluate it again.
>
> Can “gtk-im-modules” not be merged into the master branch directly?

One benefit of having a separate jobset is that we can wait until
everything is built before merging to master.  The problem here is that
this branch was entirely built several days ago, so it might be somewhat
outdated now.

Thus, could you either (1) merge locally into master and make sure no
important binaries are missing (try “guix build emacs -n” or similar),
and if that is the case, you can push; or (2) merge master into
gtk-im-modules and reevaluate the jobset?

Thanks in advance!  :-)

Ludo’.