From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] Add a bunch of LV2 audio effects! Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 23:40:46 +0200 Message-ID: <87y41tfdpd.fsf@elephly.net> References: <20161012181249.26326-1-rekado@elephly.net> <871szls3nh.fsf@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42996) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buRGo-00062k-I9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 17:41:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buRGi-000800-LL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 17:41:01 -0400 Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:21393) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1buRGi-0007zg-Cj for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 17:40:56 -0400 In-reply-to: <871szls3nh.fsf@openmailbox.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Kei Kebreau Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Kei Kebreau writes: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> Hi Guix, >> >> here's a simple patch set to add 13 new LV2 audio plugins. >> Have fun! >> >> ~~ Ricardo >> >> >> Ricardo Wurmus (13): >> gnu: Add gx-guvnor-lv2. >> gnu: Add gx-vbass-preamp-lv2. >> gnu: Add gx-overdriver-lv2. >> gnu: Add gx-tone-mender-lv2. >> gnu: Add gx-push-pull-lv2. >> gnu: Add gx-suppa-tone-bender-lv2. >> gnu: Add gx-saturator-lv2. >> gnu: Add gx-hyperion-lv2. >> gnu: Add gx-voodoo-fuzz-lv2. >> gnu: Add gx-super-fuzz-lv2. >> gnu: Add gx-vintage-fuzz-master-lv2. >> gnu: Add gx-slow-gear-lv2. >> gnu: Add gx-switchless-wah-lv2. >> >> gnu/packages/music.scm | 286 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 286 insertions(+) > > Patches 01 through 10 are clean according to "guix lint" and > reproducible. "git am" complains about 11 through 13 being corrupt for > some reason. Huh, weird. Maybe a bug in git am? FWIW, “guix lint” doesn’t complain about any of these packages. ~~ Ricardo