From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: The current state of Aarch64 on Guix Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2017 17:44:12 +0200 Message-ID: <87y3s8b1rn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20170629183758.GD1734@macbook42.flashner.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43853) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dRKZK-00068d-6h for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jul 2017 11:44:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dRKZE-0006Sm-LG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Jul 2017 11:44:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170629183758.GD1734@macbook42.flashner.co.il> (Efraim Flashner's message of "Thu, 29 Jun 2017 21:37:58 +0300") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Efraim Flashner Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi Efraim, Efraim Flashner skribis: > It sounds like its all doom and gloom, but its not too bad. `guix > package -A | wc -l' shows me 5341 (5208 without sablevm-classpath), > compared with ~5600 on x86_64. Excellent work! It looks like you=E2=80=99ve done your best without becomi= ng yourself =E2=80=9Cupstream=E2=80=9D for several packages. Very nice. I hope we can soon get an Aarch64 box into our build farm. BTW, would you like to turn your message into a post for the web site (see posts/*.md in guix-artwork.git)? It would seem useful to me to publicize your work more widely. Thank you! Ludo=E2=80=99.