From: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com>
To: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Alex ter Weele <alex.ter.weele@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Defining shepherd user services -- feedback desired
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 02:29:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y3k0mhz1.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871shzhf5j.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Mon, 05 Feb 2018 12:03:36 +0100")
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1963 bytes --]
ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> (define (services->package services)
>> "Yield a package for SERVICES by making them into a shepherd
>> configuration file via scheme-file."
>
> This makes me think that perhaps we should generalize profile, and allow
> non-package objects in there—it doesn’t feel right to define a <package>
> for something that’s conceptually not a package at all.
>
> But then that leads to issues, like what should ‘guix package -u’ do?
> How should ~/.guix-profile/manifest represent these non-package things?
> Should we add ‘guix package --install-service’ or similar? (Well, that
> may be overboard…)
Profiles are our mechanism for "activating" simple software like GNU
Hello. Software that does not need to be started, stopped, or otherwise
managed by a system like Shepherd.
What is a good mechanism for "activating" more complex software that
needs this sort of management? Perhaps we can make a "guix service"
command which performs upgrades like we do in
'upgrade-shepherd-services' (from guix/scripts/system.scm), but arranges
to execute those commands against a user-specific Shepherd, not the root
user's Shepherd? Perhaps a user profile should also have a "user
services activation script", like how an operating system declaration
has operating-system-activation-script (in gnu/system.scm)?
I personally wouldn't mind if this stuff (e.g., the service activation
script) wound up in a user's profile, but I can see what you're saying
about how it might make using manifests difficult. So, I also wouldn't
mind if the user service activation stuff was stored somewhere else, for
example in ~/.guix-services". Maybe we could we stash the activation
script into a place like ~/.guix-profile/boot, similar to how we store
an activation script for the entire system in /run/current-system/boot?
There must be a way to do this that makes sense...
--
Chris
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-11 1:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-04 1:13 Defining shepherd user services -- feedback desired Alex ter Weele
2018-02-05 11:03 ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-02-11 1:29 ` Chris Marusich [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y3k0mhz1.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=cmmarusich@gmail.com \
--cc=alex.ter.weele@gmail.com \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=ludo@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).