From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: Promoting the GNU Kind Communication Guidelines? Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 18:43:25 +0100 Message-ID: <87y3ag3ayq.fsf@elephly.net> References: <11169507.O9o76ZdvQC@aleksandar-ixtreme-m5740> <20181029092355.403e3855@alma-ubu> <87o9bd9fa7.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36171) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gHBZs-00082Z-PT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 13:43:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gHBZr-0005ua-Ts for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 13:43:48 -0400 In-reply-to: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: t_w_@freenet.de Cc: alex.sassmannshausen@gmail.com, guix-devel@gnu.org, hiphish@posteo.de Hi Thorsten, I=E2=80=99m replying to your email, but this message is also a general comm= ent about this discussion. > On 29/10/2018 12.13, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote: > >>> https://twitter.com/_sagesharp_/status/1042769399596437504 >>> using as reference: >>> http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Rape_apology_on_LCA_mailing_list >> >> I'm sorry, I'm not clear on where the factual incorrectness was in the >> things you linked to above. I did not follow the original debate in >> detail so am going on the links you provide. > > If you read what was quoted from Theodore Tso's email and now think > that calling him a rape apologist is warranted, then, as the very > least, I have to doubt your reading comprehension. Please let=E2=80=99s not go down tangents like this. Sage and Theodore Ts= =E2=80=99o are not contributors to Guix, nor is Coraline Ada Ehmke, so I would not want to discuss their activities in the context of this discussion. This community has been using the Code of Conduct for quite some time now, and I think we=E2=80=99ve been doing pretty well so far. If you would= like to improve the text of the Code of Conduct to clarify it, I would like to encourage you to submit a patch draft here: https://github.com/ContributorCovenant/contributor_covenant The text has undergone a series of revisions that demonstrate that the exact wording is not set in stone and that communities are willing to update the text to reduce misunderstandings. Discussing this here on this mailing list is likely not going to have the effect that you may be hoping for as the CoC is a tool that the maintainers have decided to adopt. If you have concrete suggestions to improve the text in the context of Guix and you think that it would not be applicable to the text that our CoC is based on, then please contact the maintainers: ludo@gnu.org and rekado@elephly.net. Thank you! -- Ricardo