From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: Audio/sound (ALSA) in guix environment --container
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 12:10:03 +0100
Message-ID: <87y350376g.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <874l7wgg75.fsf@bababa.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<878sx1h817.fsf@gnu.org> <87bm1x4kmb.fsf@elephly.net>
	<87d0mcpqy7.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <8736n84n74.fsf@elephly.net>
	<8736n8pofv.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54332)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1h96Rv-0003eT-9E
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 07:10:28 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1h96Ru-00072s-Ae
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 07:10:27 -0400
In-reply-to: <8736n8pofv.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>


Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz> writes:

> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
>
>> I suppose /etc/pam.d/ also needs to be in the container.
>
> Tried it, same error.
>
>>> What about defaulting to 1000?  It's rather common, so I guess that
>>> would be anonymous enough and "just work".
>>
>> Would it make sense to map the current user=E2=80=99s UID into the conta=
iner
>> instead of using a fixed UID?
>
> We have a "--user" option, so we could use the current user's UID when
> --user is not specified, 1000 otherwise.
> Or better: add a --uid CLI option.

I can see confusion coming from the existence of both =E2=80=9C--user=E2=80=
=9D and
=E2=80=9C--uid=E2=80=9D.  Maybe =E2=80=9C--user=E2=80=9D could take an opti=
onal argument, with the
default being the current user.  Without =E2=80=9C--user=E2=80=9D we=E2=80=
=99d use UID 1000.

What do you think?

--
Ricardo