From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: Stateful system directories Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 19:11:29 +0200 Message-ID: <87y2xij7we.fsf@elephly.net> References: <20191018073501.GB1224@E5400> <87d0euwer8.fsf@roquette.mug.biscuolo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56377) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iLVmt-0003H4-Jx for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 13:11:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iLVms-0003rA-Fg for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 13:11:39 -0400 Received: from sender4-of-o51.zoho.com ([136.143.188.51]:21157) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iLVms-0003qi-4Q for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 13:11:38 -0400 In-reply-to: <87d0euwer8.fsf@roquette.mug.biscuolo.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Giovanni Biscuolo Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Giovanni Biscuolo writes: > Hi Efraim, > > Efraim Flashner writes: > > [...] > >> I actually have the following snippet in my OS-config: >> >> ;; This directory shouldn't exist >> (file-system >> (device "none") >> (mount-point "/var/cache/fontconfig") >> (type "tmpfs") >> (flags '(read-only)) >> (check? #f)) > > yes! now that I read this I see how to workaround this class of > problems, thanks!=20 > > This snippet IMHO deserves a section in the Cookbook: would you please > like to expand this in a proper section/subsection and submit a patch? I prefer to keep workarounds for real bugs out of the Cookbook. For both fontconfig and the gdm user account=E2=80=99s home directory we should= push a workaround very soon. >> While we work on fixing these > > we in Guix you mean? shouldn't it be fixed upstream? These problems don=E2=80=99t seem to happen on any distribution. We still = have to diagnose why that is. --=20 Ricardo