From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathieu Othacehe Subject: Re: Cuirass exposes evaluation logs Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 17:36:00 +0200 Message-ID: <87y2xayx3z.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87r233qvgb.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48968) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iNf9i-0005Dg-GJ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:36:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iNf9h-0007Ks-Cw for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:36:06 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x429.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::429]:39883) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iNf9h-0007Ii-6b for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:36:05 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-x429.google.com with SMTP id a11so10522944wra.6 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 08:36:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from PF1S5GG2 (lfbn-ann-1-367-71.w86-200.abo.wanadoo.fr. [86.200.83.71]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c16sm13155534wrw.32.2019.10.24.08.36.01 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 24 Oct 2019 08:36:02 -0700 (PDT) In-reply-to: <87r233qvgb.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org Hey Ludo, > (Yeah it=E2=80=99s a bit ridiculous that we=E2=80=99ve had to make do wit= hout this > feature for so long, but at least now you no longer need to ask someone > with SSH access to berlin to parse /var/log/cuirass.log in search of > hints. :-)) That's really nice, thank you! There's also the case of evaluations that take forever (when making big changes in core-updates for instance), and eventually fail. I hope we will be able to understand why with this new feedback. Thanks, Mathieu