From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Timothy Sample Subject: Re: Stackage LTS 14 Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 19:42:54 -0500 Message-ID: <87y2wffi41.fsf@ngyro.com> References: <875zjpa8ds.fsf@ngyro.com> <5875E349-48AC-4EDC-9FFF-8AFEFE6643C2@asu.edu> <871rucalwt.fsf@ngyro.com> <87o8xepl0g.fsf@ngyro.com> <87k182h4fb.fsf@devup.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49989) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iW8eZ-0006ON-JT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 19:43:00 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iW8eY-0005Zo-LC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 19:42:59 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:46235) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iW8eY-0005YP-DG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 19:42:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87k182h4fb.fsf@devup.no> (Marius Bakke's message of "Thu, 14 Nov 2019 16:18:48 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Marius Bakke Cc: guix-devel Hi, Marius Bakke writes: > I've read some of the changes and they LGTM. If Cuirass is happy, I > think you can go ahead and merge the branch. \o/ I just put everything together and rebased it all on master, fixing several typos as I did so. :) It seems that =E2=80=9Cghc@8.6.5=E2=80=9D h= as changed a few days ago on master, so everything will have to be rebuilt. Given that, I recreated the wip-haskell-updates branch so that the build farm can get to it. Once it=E2=80=99s done, I=E2=80=99ll push to master. The only thing I wanted to mention was that I sneaked a newer version of =E2=80=9Clibyaml=E2=80=9D (0.2.1) in along side the old version (0.1.7). T= he Haskell bindings required the newer version. It=E2=80=99s possible that we could j= ust update the old version, but it has quite a few dependencies, so I didn=E2= =80=99t want to get tangled up in it. I=E2=80=99m bringing it up because it=E2=80= =99s the only non-Haskell change in the commits, and I don=E2=80=99t want anyone to be surprised. :) -- Tim