Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> skribis:

> Hi Guillaume,
>
> Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net> skribis:
>
>> Currently no substitutes are built for the testing branch because the
>> evaluation fails. The log at https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/16794/log/raw
>> ends with:
>
> You mean the ‘staging’ branch?
>

Yes, I meant 'staging'. I often type 'testing' instead of 'staging',
probably that pesky muscle memory!.

>> guix/inferior.scm:247:2: ERROR:
>>   1. &inferior-exception:
>>       arguments: (keyword-argument-error #f "Unrecognized keyword" () (#:builder))
>>       inferior: #<<inferior> pid: pipe socket: #<input-output: string 7f07952ae690> close: #<procedure close-pipe (p)> version: (0 1 1) packages: #<promise #<procedure 7f07951d62c0 at guix/inferior.scm:162:32 ()>> table: #<promise #<procedure 7f079e960480 at guix/inferior.scm:163:32 ()>>>
>>       stack: ((#f ("ice-9/boot-9.scm" 1763 13)) (raise-exception ("ice-9/boot-9.scm" 1666 16)) (raise-exception ("ice-9/boot-9.scm" 1668 16)) (#f ("guix/build-system/asdf.scm" 279 2)) (thunk ("guix/packages.scm" 1397 22)) (package-derivation ("guix/packages.scm" 1079 16)) (job ("gnu/ci.scm" 383 24)) (filter-map ("srfi/srfi-1.scm" 690 23)) (#f ("gnu/ci.scm" 497 31)) (map1 ("srfi/srfi-1.scm" 585 17)) (append-map ("srfi/srfi-1.scm" 672 15)) (hydra-jobs ("gnu/ci.scm" 482 4)) (#f ("ice-9/eval.scm" 158 9)) (#f ("ice-9/eval.scm" 158 9)) (with-exception-handler ("ice-9/boot-9.scm" 1735 10)) (call-with-prompt ("ice-9/boot-9.scm" 717 2)) (dynamic-wind ("ice-9/boot-9.scm" 141 2)) (#f (#f #f #f)) (#f ("guix/repl.scm" 92 21)) (with-exception-handler ("ice-9/boot-9.scm" 1735 10)) (with-exception-handler ("ice-9/boot-9.scm" 1730 15)) (#f ("guix/repl.scm" 119 7)))
>>
>> If I understand this correctly, there's a '#:builder' keyword somewhere
>> that is causing a problem. Does someone know where it can come from, or
>> how to fix the issue?
>
> Right.  I’d look at guix/build-system/asdf.scm:279:2 on that branch (per
> the inferior stack trace above).  Does that give useful info?

I didn't see any obvious problem in that file; the strange thing is that
'make', 'make as-derivation' and './pre-inst-env guix build ...' all
work fine.

In a local branch I merged the current master (3699ed6) into staging
(de96ed1) and I'm going to try to start a local cuirass daemon to see
wether I can reproduce the issue or not.

Given that merging master in staging hasn't been done in a while, should
I also push my updated staging branch, or maybe someone is already
working on it?