From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id yEDOAKSJEmB5LAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 09:53:40 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id KIIsOKOJEmCKVQAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 09:53:39 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 835839402A7 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 09:53:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:60446 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l53ze-0003Gb-H9 for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 04:53:38 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41196) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l53yX-0002ET-5X for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 04:52:29 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39604) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l53yW-0001Zr-Tf; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 04:52:28 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:19b:d9a0:98b7:b002:9499:5e2c] (port=40714 helo=cervin) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l53yT-00074v-FY; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 04:52:26 -0500 From: Mathieu Othacehe To: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: Staging branch [substitute availability] References: Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:52:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Leo Famulari's message of "Tue, 26 Jan 2021 18:51:13 -0500") Message-ID: <87y2gd8k2v.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.85 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 835839402A7 X-Spam-Score: -2.85 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: R2IsC9+Ahb1e Hey Leo, > So, minor improvements to aarch64, but x86_64 is actually worse! > Mathieu, I'm curious, are we using the overdrives again? Or still > emulating aarch64? I have not connected the overdrives yet, so the aarch64 builds are still 100% emulated. Regarding x86_64, I guess it's because it took ~1.5 days for the CI to catch up, as you can see here: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/metrics. "guix time-machine --branch=staging -- weather" now reports 82.7% coverage for x86_64. > `guix weather` said to me that there are *no* queued builds for x86_64 > on staging, but ci.guix.gnu.org web interface shows that there are > queued builds. That's because %query-limit is 1000 in (guix ci). It means that "guix weather" will ask at most for the last 1000 queued builds. If they are all aarch64 builds, then it will erroneously report that there are no x86_64 queued builds. Thanks, Mathieu