From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
To: Joshua Branson <jbranso@dismail.de>, raingloom <raingloom@riseup.net>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 19:53:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y2edifyp.fsf@netris.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tup1lu0v.fsf@dismail.de>
Joshua Branson <jbranso@dismail.de> writes:
> raingloom <raingloom@riseup.net> writes:
>>
>> What about a Liberapay for Guix? Could also be used to pay developers.
>>
>
> I'd be game for something like this. We could have a guix membership.
> Drew Devault has a "secret irc" channel for paying patreons. Perhaps we
> could advertise a guix membership on the guix site.
Then, the Guix leadership would have to decide which Guix developers are
worthy of funding, and how much. Those who are excluded may feel that
their contributions are insufficiently valued, and therefore feel
alienated. Sounds to me like it would open up a huge can of worms, so
to speak.
Regards,
Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-23 23:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-16 11:10 [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching Léo Le Bouter
2021-03-16 11:17 ` Jonathan Brielmaier
2021-03-16 11:27 ` Léo Le Bouter
2021-03-16 19:15 ` Leo Famulari
2021-03-16 23:19 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-03-16 23:49 ` Leo Famulari
2021-03-17 11:54 ` Guix moving too fast? zimoun
2021-03-17 6:07 ` [opinion] CVE-patching is not sufficient for package security patching Léo Le Bouter
2021-03-17 6:21 ` Léo Le Bouter
2021-03-20 11:19 ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-03-22 13:44 ` raingloom
2021-03-23 16:22 ` Joshua Branson
2021-03-23 23:53 ` Mark H Weaver [this message]
2021-03-23 17:56 ` Leo Famulari
2021-03-23 22:54 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2021-03-24 19:51 ` Leo Famulari
2021-03-24 20:24 ` Vincent Legoll
2021-03-24 20:32 ` Léo Le Bouter
2021-03-24 20:55 ` Leo Famulari
2021-03-25 14:22 ` Mathieu Othacehe
2021-03-25 18:19 ` Leo Famulari
2021-03-30 8:42 ` Buying AArch64 hardware? Ludovic Courtès
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y2edifyp.fsf@netris.org \
--to=mhw@netris.org \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=jbranso@dismail.de \
--cc=raingloom@riseup.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).