From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:306:f42::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id 0HeqJik3yWEd/AAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 27 Dec 2021 04:46:49 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id OASHIyk3yWGHugAAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 27 Dec 2021 04:46:49 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61DD9138AC for ; Mon, 27 Dec 2021 04:46:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:39992 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n1gyG-0003NM-IX for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 26 Dec 2021 22:46:48 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57376) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n1gy5-0003My-Kq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Dec 2021 22:46:37 -0500 Received: from [2607:f8b0:4864:20::835] (port=45799 helo=mail-qt1-x835.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n1gy3-0008Pf-VA for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Dec 2021 22:46:37 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-x835.google.com with SMTP id p19so12539520qtw.12 for ; Sun, 26 Dec 2021 19:46:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=X88JfarKVNJch5iT+aRuuEekc9NhtwDG9WdMjh89ZrA=; b=COK75yBaJkEhIuV/sxyMt/XznEO7OTNbRMZkMG2YRI4b6BtjUko16tHFXMhF+fR8VW UD0eawH04feUeJuvFMtsSdfaZ6ptxy6VqlCWqStgvcWpeLTYso9NlqIeaMjt9U1AAeHP Wct65EsHGp1UWlCFYeTlCwyftud5teLTjAtGLRQlQxeGSvNP4erxfzf4VsfHUtvt8Uwi aREyaWYwaAVJcBaiw5sxryevTspJ6MZ4GlD11mpWlkSkwz1jPZtRxZnGnf4+eun2tq+p bROGQtv8FkL55ooROIwfFL9WsCxnd1kgXWqk8WPu9BXQgi+23aLgMSbdNt+2lJG9fa50 AQIw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=X88JfarKVNJch5iT+aRuuEekc9NhtwDG9WdMjh89ZrA=; b=r738c32+ojwqUJeg0HYqcVKiowsZscNJKRV2LuwFx85HGv2k/dfdEB/sf/DpwxE6B1 Ki35h9LLEED6POqCeQF+Z0sMakUd3OHvnfsh6nZ14onXPtbJ4Mv03+KOxjDrSlRx3i13 5RLdPHRcpoBB2pqb0NkwIci1UFuVsDyhDtkbNznb/n3yNl3icNvIzC56wvLy0sHYt9gX vGKUTxi1Aj92C5IiQi3/eZDB7/epCXB06sPpNOZFHQ1FZUe5cdrBdyj7cwPAfiBrOPWG xkNRfPhCIgrvhTBhQngVr7CcMwVtfFlKDFas2E6BXS2FAcWU4HhSGDRKI3jkrRYhtvrs 74Ng== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531MXo3GvRVjsB/2KsieNSIsIISX4rJU60s9MF89xYgTnK+Oc/fa OknttF3o7igws0UGZ2X/E+b/grhAgEs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy4vF4ObN+ct5YP+/yPB8Rwr4I5mVU7/OepuHR5ayiqi8TqFFlIyZG8tXQ6UzHLFfB3IqDzqw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:20e:: with SMTP id b14mr13354029qtx.288.1640576794853; Sun, 26 Dec 2021 19:46:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from hurd (dsl-10-128-55.b2b2c.ca. [72.10.128.55]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d20sm11507261qtg.73.2021.12.26.19.46.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 26 Dec 2021 19:46:34 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: Vagrant Cascadian Subject: Re: Release v1.4 (or 2.0): process and schedule ? References: <86ilvq5kmf.fsf@gmail.com> <86ilvnh7kt.fsf@gmail.com> <87v8zk2fe3.fsf@gmail.com> <877dbxznto.fsf@ponder> Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2021 22:46:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: <877dbxznto.fsf@ponder> (Vagrant Cascadian's message of "Tue, 21 Dec 2021 12:48:35 -0800") Message-ID: <87y246wvza.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2607:f8b0:4864:20::835 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::835; envelope-from=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com; helo=mail-qt1-x835.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -12 X-Spam_score: -1.3 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix Devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1640576809; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=X88JfarKVNJch5iT+aRuuEekc9NhtwDG9WdMjh89ZrA=; b=biG3XXX+REIYvEwTBXbkH91ixzgWCtJ9CJOdS1KraHBATucUgl5oRBPcSVhOt+Ng1fpJeH VNfwsGgRkhQgDNNIjKw8sHmBkgRUv2Yi9qYvwRpow2TAstaUWwRUhSAxRVbGx2VCmaN7iM hbKvbdv7sCnfURofT35bHGVFSey01xPQOCnBXwSP2NsWSgjWXTaXUpedk428MmpK+0vW/m 2tTALyjyi3q+3ehZsqTscxSX3v85Zlfm6MbV3AQZHScXcVZfUpohLfmzZ+cDV3pmtjrl55 GcbIDsvOeD9m0widwaJgiTjJlWO0Om9VM0C7a5yvndebjmAExSV7oSj5Pl7yxw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1640576809; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=VdzmgYHQkPfvcGVSOFC3eVbbPhu5ZXjQi19B0p3XlSOXfUmQm7nGvVz/AHJnsb8U1X8iQ1 4Ah7xj3PCJlWJMWlQLZVaJjM5oPICW0VDWgYegMIFi45sFDz2uUE8ns3Zr3Y5jGiV2lyDI XFfrN5/3G5zHESdlwZlTaZmho9ZSzMy9IzthMSxBWiv3u6wFb2L6nNpo5DmB0qaxuXlncB pwxut/HaKTFsbaa8EF3nHcHFH1hqLB+YJxSOPFc0HVa/gYhgiuR0jmtnI5VO6MLId6Un4j 8QXZ8cPvZ71gRPLUFep8UeP8UNJlRbCJmzVc1oIBfGvT6NnKqUa1aIuzntRbvA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=COK75yBa; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.77 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=COK75yBa; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 61DD9138AC X-Spam-Score: -1.77 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: +tK4AnNKQjYW Hi Vagrant, Vagrant Cascadian writes: > On 2021-12-19, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >> zimoun writes: >>> Now core-updates-frozen is merged. Now The Big Change [1 ]is done. Do >>> we go for v1.4 or v2.0? >> >> As I've mentioned previously, I'd go for a 1.4.0 release, since overall >> we've refined and improved (greatly!) what we already had rather than >> introduced something revolutionary. I'd keep a 2.0.0 for when we have >> p2p distributed substitutes, a custom graphical tool and/or integration >> with the 'Software' application in GNOME, this kind of big user-facing >> changes. But that's just my personal opinion :-). If the majority >> feels a 2.0.0 is more suitable, I won't mind. >> >>> In both case, what is the target for a release date? I propose January >>> 31rst. WDYT? >> >> I'd like to fix #52051 before issuing the first release candidate (RC). >> Assuming this can be made before the end of January with the first RC >> coming out around New Year, and that the kind of collaboration I've seen >> in the last weeks continues at the same intensity, this seems >> achievable. > > Would it be appropriate to fix the ~700 low-hanbging fruit issues that > are identified by: > > guix lint --checkers=description,synopsis > > It is not the most exciting work technically, but it is relatively easy, > and low risk, maybe the worst it does is put a bit more work on > translators... > > Maybe there are also other low hanging fruit guix lint knows about that > would not be particularly disruptive? > > It is not particularly urgent for a release, per se, but I suspect it > will just grow and grow without some sort of cycle to address such > trivial issues... and doing such cleanup before making a release would > aim for a higher standard of craftspersonship. :) About the current status, I'm nearing on pushing a version-1.4.0 branch which is based on master with a few more (core-ish) updates. There's still a few days ahead of that, so if you manage to get many of this kind of problems fixed & merged in master they can easily be included in the next release. HTH, Maxim