unofficial mirror of guix-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>
To: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org>
Cc: Guix Devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Release v1.4 (or 2.0): process and schedule ?
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2021 22:46:33 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y246wvza.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877dbxznto.fsf@ponder> (Vagrant Cascadian's message of "Tue, 21 Dec 2021 12:48:35 -0800")

Hi Vagrant,

Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org> writes:

> On 2021-12-19, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>> zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:
>>> Now core-updates-frozen is merged.  Now The Big Change [1 ]is done.  Do
>>> we go for v1.4 or v2.0?
>>
>> As I've mentioned previously, I'd go for a 1.4.0 release, since overall
>> we've refined and improved (greatly!) what we already had rather than
>> introduced something revolutionary.  I'd keep a 2.0.0 for when we have
>> p2p distributed substitutes, a custom graphical tool and/or integration
>> with the 'Software' application in GNOME, this kind of big user-facing
>> changes.  But that's just my personal opinion :-).  If the majority
>> feels a 2.0.0 is more suitable, I won't mind.
>>
>>> In both case, what is the target for a release date?  I propose January
>>> 31rst.  WDYT?
>>
>> I'd like to fix #52051 before issuing the first release candidate (RC).
>> Assuming this can be made before the end of January with the first RC
>> coming out around New Year, and that the kind of collaboration I've seen
>> in the last weeks continues at the same intensity, this seems
>> achievable.
>
> Would it be appropriate to fix the ~700 low-hanbging fruit issues that
> are identified by:
>
>   guix lint --checkers=description,synopsis
>
> It is not the most exciting work technically, but it is relatively easy,
> and low risk, maybe the worst it does is put a bit more work on
> translators...
>
> Maybe there are also other low hanging fruit guix lint knows about that
> would not be particularly disruptive?
>
> It is not particularly urgent for a release, per se, but I suspect it
> will just grow and grow without some sort of cycle to address such
> trivial issues... and doing such cleanup before making a release would
> aim for a higher standard of craftspersonship. :)

About the current status, I'm nearing on pushing a version-1.4.0 branch
which is based on master with a few more (core-ish) updates.  There's
still a few days ahead of that, so if you manage to get many of this
kind of problems fixed & merged in master they can easily be included in
the next release.

HTH,

Maxim


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-12-27  3:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-15  8:37 Release process and schedule ? zimoun
2021-12-17 10:03 ` Release v1.4 (or 2.0): " zimoun
2021-12-20  2:12   ` Maxim Cournoyer
2021-12-20  3:43     ` raingloom
2021-12-20  9:04     ` zimoun
2021-12-20  9:14       ` zimoun
2021-12-20 21:24       ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-12-20 22:54         ` zimoun
2021-12-20 18:12     ` Bengt Richter
2021-12-21 20:48     ` Vagrant Cascadian
2021-12-21 21:20       ` Vagrant Cascadian
2022-01-03 14:31         ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-01-03 16:32           ` Vagrant Cascadian
2021-12-27  3:46       ` Maxim Cournoyer [this message]
2022-01-03 14:33         ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-01-04 16:24           ` Maxim Cournoyer
2022-01-04 19:32         ` Chris Marusich
2022-01-06 13:49           ` Maxim Cournoyer
2022-01-09  2:21             ` Chris Marusich
2022-01-18  5:05               ` Maxim Cournoyer
2022-01-18 13:20                 ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-01-15 19:26         ` Vagrant Cascadian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87y246wvza.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com \
    --cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=vagrant@debian.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).