From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id wOblGEuZBmQ7PwEASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 07 Mar 2023 02:54:19 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id eEFBGUuZBmTikgAAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 07 Mar 2023 02:54:19 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FF476DC0 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2023 02:54:19 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=envs.net header.s=modoboa header.b=XTVjhNjU; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1678154059; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=2GAWOIiRfTd7juQY8tm6DlYMsN5MUD2CJLf6YFNXbWw=; b=M2iLbsjJRg/pE4uQIz2Qsvy9NSAMpZnu7OyWtLSOcUVoCcykW8+fRFVq5UJiDfjnedfXcR kNwp4qRrGzeKLHVvS9YTWv6AasoS6fGSUfYGJxV1F3SGQaovjW/iTCMCrB0RIoiN6GHBd8 dSbpYQFg8xC2q6PBtdrOcPqyTSumHlsgQODweOilLvr7ZoGGL8/4aq0SJWlnMNClADUtfs 382WRC4VkgsAZbZvRrGDzCyvFi+GeICqFsJv4KMWXeRtmGy+XyOkhnv8cMotnurcIqtLol /TvF4JTTXSKDf/ZVKKSlwnL1srCxoMFzXbfogZSTBU0Mqbj1/WXHB9wxAUL1hQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1678154059; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=n6WvGbfrpvVoCmT4zAJ9iwjjVT1DqtsBPOC586CDRxM7rH2lVsb9fMjWLwvkpEb664G0vS AJAv6lWq0APIHXoP9i0ak4c7NZEM62Y3IhfQ4aLtS+AqFLpeFsI4ut7/Gakk9bfaoAyKSZ 1OEVL/3bDoWaBHK1+hUn6tNerRzGThZhA7Kjs9wHNrN+wr0lhsNyv1Ui3/6QQf0aL8XxbP RdujvNTm8TvO9SYPElPnef4wybCjIDBQ73qBIVaCyV4B+YrSX/gTIRpLkYVlFOQ9Vphjzy kxpd3zfs9pVcKM6OOV01QVIFOmNYVSGncqM3TyDyg9WzkiMSgz7HCFpp8rHTEg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=envs.net header.s=modoboa header.b=XTVjhNjU; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pZMWi-0005B1-Ss; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 20:54:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pZMWg-00059r-Jr for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 20:54:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pZMWg-0002u4-Bc for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 20:54:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pZMWg-0007h7-7r for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 20:54:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#61894] [PATCH RFC] Team approval for patches Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2023 01:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61894 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Christopher Baines , 61894@debbugs.gnu.org, guix-maintainers@gnu.org Received: via spool by 61894-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61894.167815400329530 (code B ref 61894); Tue, 07 Mar 2023 01:54:02 +0000 Received: (at 61894) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Mar 2023 01:53:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44085 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pZMW2-0007gD-SR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 20:53:23 -0500 Received: from mail.envs.net ([5.199.136.28]:52284) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pZMW0-0007g4-5i for 61894@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 20:53:21 -0500 Received: from localhost (mail.envs.net [127.0.0.1]) by mail.envs.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E506638A0876; Tue, 7 Mar 2023 01:53:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=envs.net; s=modoboa; t=1678153997; bh=2GAWOIiRfTd7juQY8tm6DlYMsN5MUD2CJLf6YFNXbWw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=XTVjhNjUqKrGny5UNhGz2feCEvDwR4Jca5y07YDO+Qcpxw74DCs/k4k7zewoG1Gb9 33SwXiUBuRxK6YFCQCY03hmsFY2wAxocGGwR3PoOzmiPLDEhcY4pqcUbosbYdP5DYI O6OUl+RG8ijJ8sURDtfykNIpzVV+fsyynqzLfxfGBvzKkK1DOnRoS/UsH+lmA4cVrz 9lyvCNI0t4ZEL1mlfGWaNcr3D3m7XPaVoTJnVBsR15BWhaTFApvVK9t8H5Jq9J3Ot5 A4zzUrIhVccSt9vqu5q9dK2iV8WjNF50gnKPps8f7JV6KMIP1p9sDh1X7NoZiqCsPn beDrJAV7F+eGqhA010BeKZzCLOpJdJ21AlFi06oFrYXGIdS+enJTT9BTwP/BICYstl FxtGwgklCh6kKfETbSiqoNLxvv7N2gb9SeHOl5qdCmNiehK6G08ckF1ClINS8lqJOn gVyTSXKNnFI1FlB9KZ7rYQJCC7q7lQoLQwMj9HwNmzAhHLAgB6cDPm7wrvbNZ0Hku6 feWVhzftu7tlY7HMi7KDg1nXBsci91uKy2hCHahySbnLF9L/OF/NMBuIh38oEjH6s2 EsiabVmYRfHIa2YaP5ByHrYlQxN8r/f8hvvkrYDcRaANowwMVVPW1xzBV8i5Z13WUy bjaiHL5Os7hK0G6Fh7Ex0zJc= X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.envs.net Received: from mail.envs.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.envs.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id Qp51V3LlTx49; Tue, 7 Mar 2023 01:53:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [182.150.116.135]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.envs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 7 Mar 2023 01:53:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [local]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 5fe60a11; Tue, 7 Mar 2023 01:53:29 +0000 (UTC) References: <878rgga1qv.fsf@inria.fr> <871qm8wf8e.fsf@cbaines.net> <87r0u86qgo.fsf_-_@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2023 09:53:29 +0800 In-Reply-To: <87r0u86qgo.fsf_-_@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s message of "Wed, 01 Mar 2023 23:45:27 +0100") Message-ID: <87y1o9mina.fsf_-_@envs.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6?= X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 1FF476DC0 X-Spam-Score: -2.81 X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.81 X-ACL-Warn: , =?utf-8?b?5a6L5paH5q2mIHZpYSBHdWl4LXBhdGNoZXM=?= From: =?utf-8?b?5a6L5paH5q2mIHZpYSBHdWl4LXBhdGNoZXM=?= via Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-TUID: TifyC9Wnnqi+ Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hi Chris, > > Christopher Baines skribis: > >> Regarding this change specifically though, I'm unclear how it would >> impact the things I push for others. I pushed some patches today, would >> this mean that I'd have to look at what team/teams are involved >> (according to /etc/teams.scm.in) for each commit/series, and then either >> continue if I'm a member of that team, or skip it if I'm not? >> >> If I'm going to not be pushing stuff I would have previously pushed >> because I'm not in the relevant teams, maybe I should just add myself to >> every team? I guess this is not a serious question, but I'm more making >> the point that if teams become a formal part of patch review, then some >> formalities over membership of a team is probably a prerequsite. >> > [...] > > Good questions. > > For teams like =E2=80=98core=E2=80=99 or =E2=80=98home=E2=80=99, there sh= ould be no overlap, so it=E2=80=99s > quite easy to see who=E2=80=99s in charge. > [...] > For =E2=80=9Crandom packages=E2=80=9D, I=E2=80=99m fine with the status q= uo. Hello, I'd like to know if I'm working fine according to the status quo.. I usually push patches for others who don't have commit access, while most packages don't have a team at all, and some with me as the only team member. Should I wait for another commiter's approvol under this new policy or can I push "random packages" (eg: jwm) solo under the status quo? For packages I as the only team member (eg: fcitx), should I looking for another commiter for other's patches and my patches? Thank you!