From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: gettext: Enable "xgettext --language=glade"
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 22:00:05 +0100
Message-ID: <87wqk64ucq.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20131117122546.GA32131@debian>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53309)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1Vi9S1-00015P-N1
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2013 16:00:19 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1Vi9Rv-0008M3-DS
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2013 16:00:13 -0500
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:4189)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1Vi9Rv-0008In-7z
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2013 16:00:07 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20131117122546.GA32131@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Sun,
	17 Nov 2013 13:25:46 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

> As discussed yesterday on irc, the current gettext does not handle glade,
> as it is not linked with expat. This causes problems when patching pspp,
> for instance. The attached patch solves the problem and compiles on maste=
r.
> Is it okay to push it to core-updates, to avoid disruption on master?
> Since guile currently does not compile in core-updates, I cannot test
> the patch there.

The patch looks good to me.

I=E2=80=99m currently working on a patch to fix the libgcc_s issue that bre=
aks
Guile in core-updates.  If you don=E2=80=99t mind, I=E2=80=99ll push both y=
our patch and
mine at once, to avoid overloading Hydra.

Thanks!

Ludo=E2=80=99.