From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: sdcv: Add new variable. Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 17:02:05 +0100 Message-ID: <87wq2d2cxu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1426497533-7895-1-git-send-email-sleep_walker@gnu.org> <874mpilmwa.fsf@gnu.org> <20150318122519.GB525@venom.suse.cz> <873852fn9i.fsf@gnu.org> <20150318145616.GB27555@venom> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60377) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YYctg-0002Q3-3u for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:02:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YYctc-0006GI-0z for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:02:12 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:33115) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YYctb-0006G7-TN for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:02:07 -0400 Received: from pluto.bordeaux.inria.fr ([193.50.110.57]:35569 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YYctb-0006xq-BX for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:02:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150318145616.GB27555@venom> (=?utf-8?B?IlRvbcOhxaEgxIxl?= =?utf-8?B?Y2giJ3M=?= message of "Wed, 18 Mar 2015 15:56:16 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 =C4=8Cech skribis: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 02:28:25PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >>Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 =C4=8Cech skribis: [...] >>And at , sdvc describes itself as the >>=E2=80=9Cconsole version of [the] StarDict program=E2=80=9D, which is not >>confidence-inspiring. Some files such as dictziplib.cpp do indeed seem >>to come from StarDict. > > I wasn't afraid before but now it works as FUD from the sf.net side > because the lack of information available. > >>Could you check if you can find more information? It=E2=80=99s in Debian= and >>not on , which is encouraging. > > > The file you mentioned looks like from stardict project, but was > originally taken from dictd-1.9.7 as it states and during it's history > it always had GPL license (started with GPL1). Good. > But there are also similarities between > stardict-3.0.4/dict/src/lib/mapfile.h > and > sdcv-0.5.0-beta4-Source/src/mapfile.hpp > > and that is missing license in sdcv completely. > > Further - distance.cpp (GPL) and distance.hpp (no license in header) > are probably related among projects. OK. > Lets scratch it whole, I'm not laywer. > > When there is webkit package, I may give a try to GoldenDict. GNU Dico and the original dictd projects seem to provide comparable replacements. Would these fulfill the same use cases? If the answer is yes, then indeed, let=E2=80=99s remove sdcv and add these instead. If the answer is no, it may be best to get advice from gnu-linux-libre@nongnu.org. Thanks for investigating! Ludo=E2=80=99.