From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Texinfo in descriptions? Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 15:35:55 +0200 Message-ID: <87wpxs9ux0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wpy0nygt.fsf@gmail.com> <87y4ige2ux.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87wpy0t83c.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3o7pz3h.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87y4ietrdz.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <874mkx8a5o.fsf@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45594) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZHuBq-0000we-2J for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 09:36:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZHuBi-00065H-HK for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 09:36:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <874mkx8a5o.fsf@openmailbox.org> (Mathieu Lirzin's message of "Tue, 21 Jul 2015 23:37:23 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Mathieu Lirzin Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Alex Kost Mathieu Lirzin skribis: > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: [...] > As much as I would appreciate texinfo markup in that context, I think it > will still confuse our translator friends. In=20 > (info "(gettext)Preparing Strings") we can found this: [...] > Sure HTML markup will not be pretty, but at least it will not encourage > people to put lists everywhere (for example for listing features instead > of describing what the package is doing). Well, we can email the coordinator asking what they think of this. Although not my favorite choice, HTML/XML would be fine too, as long as we restrict ourselves to a clear subset. (gnu.org actually uses the descriptions from the Womb (like we do), but adds HTML markup in it: .) > My secret dream is that descriptions (and their translation) would be > managed directly in the FSD (Free Software Directory) so that we can > import those directly and care only about the building and deployment > process ;). This has been discussed in the past (=E2=80=98TODO=E2=80=99 has an item abo= ut it.) Unfortunately, there is currently no way to do it automatically. I=E2=80= =99m also not sure whether our criteria match theirs. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.