From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nils Gillmann Subject: Re: inclusion of openrc init file Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 23:55:13 +0200 Message-ID: <87wpojzl4u.fsf@grrlz.net> References: <87vb43mzj9.fsf@grrlz.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49708) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1alO5K-0001Yo-LT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:55:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1alO5G-0000gh-Ku for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:55:30 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:41339) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1alO5G-0000gY-EL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:55:26 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1alO5F-0006GX-6M for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 23:55:25 +0200 Received: from xd9bb90b5.dyn.telefonica.de ([217.187.144.181]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 23:55:25 +0200 Received: from niasterisk by xd9bb90b5.dyn.telefonica.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 23:55:25 +0200 List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org The only problem with the succesful building source version of Guix is, that guix pull works, up to the point where workers would be called, and for this small error message guix package: error: build failed: the build users group `guixbuild' has no members I have more than enough logs now. Irritating is that the users are created, they are in the group and the openrc service has the right parameters. Maybe someone has ideas for how to fix it, otherwise i'll just try debugging this on low priority until I find a solution. I can append or link to thousands of lines of debug output from todays session if someone wants to look into it. -- ng personal contact: http://krosos.sdf.org EDN: https://wiki.c3d2.de/EDN