From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: Grafting fails for latest Go release candidate Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 22:08:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87wp6fb0p7.fsf@fastmail.com> References: <20170731143925.GA19814@jasmine.lan> <87wp6kuzrp.fsf@fastmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37698) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1deoKC-0002DL-R7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2017 16:08:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1deoK7-0007Ol-NT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2017 16:08:28 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:60305) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1deoK7-0007Ob-HG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2017 16:08:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87wp6kuzrp.fsf@fastmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari , guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Marius Bakke writes: > Leo Famulari writes: > >> Working on the Go package, I found that the grafting procedure fails in >> a way that I don't understand: >> >> ------ >> $ ./pre-inst-env guix build go@1.9 >> The following derivation will be built: >> /gnu/store/bv30jxzjl7c5z3hk6pmywpzwwrn1hq5m-go-1.9rc1.drv >> @ build-started /gnu/store/bv30jxzjl7c5z3hk6pmywpzwwrn1hq5m-go-1.9rc1.dr= v - x86_64-linux /var/log/guix/drvs/bv//30jxzjl7c5z3hk6pmywpzwwrn1hq5m-go-1= .9rc1.drv.bz2 >> grafting '/gnu/store/8zbi5rr5q2pxksfgpxq37m60nsa21d3v-go-1.9rc1-doc' -> = '/gnu/store/6v24sf0b3hgyc80b4w2yvx1aw03zinw6-go-1.9rc1-doc'... >> grafting '/gnu/store/73fvsx0qizcrbajgjwn8mkzkpxa6abx4-go-1.9rc1' -> '/gn= u/store/ghg75mjw3csiv9hf7q0cxrm1g0fx5d0k-go-1.9rc1'... >> ERROR: In procedure put-bytevector: Value out of range: 0 >> builder for `/gnu/store/bv30jxzjl7c5z3hk6pmywpzwwrn1hq5m-go-1.9rc1.drv' = failed with exit code 1 >> @ build-failed /gnu/store/bv30jxzjl7c5z3hk6pmywpzwwrn1hq5m-go-1.9rc1.drv= - 1 builder for `/gnu/store/bv30jxzjl7c5z3hk6pmywpzwwrn1hq5m-go-1.9rc1.drv= ' failed with exit code 1 >> guix build: error: build failed: build of `/gnu/store/bv30jxzjl7c5z3hk6p= mywpzwwrn1hq5m-go-1.9rc1.drv' failed > > I just got a similar, but not quite same error: > > grafting '/gnu/store/mqlhrs9xj7rdnm3apzj2las4fr84i3gy-git-2.13.4' -> '/gn= u/store/7kfijk9k2vq7c9bg6zy2pb2xpzs6s5b0-git-2.13.4'... > ERROR: In procedure put-bytevector: Wrong type argument in position 1 (ex= pecting open output port): # I've caught a couple other elusive grafting errors: grafting '/gnu/store/ccw7wzh9rbflc0fl968dbj2x0x9dn4y5-chromium-60.0.3112.90= ' -> '/gnu/store/b3f2d6l1c546xwcv4hg8619qh87cixhb-chromium-60.0.3112.90'... ERROR: Wrong type to apply: "der */\n max-width: 638px;\n min"=20 Wait, what? And this: grafting '/gnu/store/r4ylhf3cx6gp4iv1m056i58hqwz7m0n5-git-2.14.0' -> '/gnu/= store/vy3rj6sc412kxabfisqiywp5z4by21jn-git-2.14.0'... ERROR: In procedure vector-ref: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expectin= g vector): #(#f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f= #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #t #t #t #t #t #t #t #t #t #t #f #f #f #f= #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f= #f #f #t #t #t #t #f #t #t #t #t #t #t #t #t #t #f #t #t #t #t #f #f #t #t #t #t #t #f #f #f #f #f= #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f= #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f= #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f= #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f #f) These were sampled from different systems so it's not a local issue. Clearly something is spilling memory, or reading the wrong address, but what? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlmIyLQACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPr45AgAqg8VfpRp3lM5ISdk23zq8XWQ0Aub78wb6eYjA7RcEpgtxeQzxEolExW9 hvLz24rjBYp+9jLljbiVZWUimHOp0p6J7NCwAe0FgXtm3AwxF9HfMzx/ff2Ird0V 6seTDND6NDxIxuSbdTgpzhwYolZ5CMI3tlK4Kig2h5LmcVNVJos25T/5lVpb7OQq dPiBUZwI+lRrjdTIAHlB3XU54c719WJTovwq9A/M/2XxIXyteBt8rX+GZ8b8+TR1 0vYHa0C9q+FBcZoVNoU8Ub6bZHZzmTxe8LxzEMMtnGts2RsZ26hhAzxyWM6FHcWa ZQydvGbi3T3WkOXe6FLJFTLPYpTppA== =R9Lq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--