From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [PATCH] gnu: Add ungoogled-chromium. Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 14:44:07 +0100 Message-ID: <87wolxyzx4.fsf@nckx> References: <20190202192023.22087-1-mbakke@fastmail.com> <87k1igpwk8.fsf@dismail.de> <20190203235204.63970587@parabola> <87sgx3mbcq.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvhf5f8d.fsf@dustycloud.org> <20190216030021.374f4c82@parabola> <87va1kav33.fsf@posteo.net> <87lg2f5wqk.fsf@posteo.net> <87k1hz5wh8.fsf@posteo.net> <20190216203933.218dfb67@parabola> <87bm3axcyl.fsf@elephly.net> <20190218070557.12fc0471@parabola> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54780) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gvjDi-0004GY-9c for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 08:44:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gvjDe-0001h0-Fq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 08:44:29 -0500 Received: from tobias.gr ([2001:470:7405::1]:57008) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gvjDa-0001b1-QQ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 08:44:24 -0500 In-reply-to: <20190218070557.12fc0471@parabola> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org Cc: gnu-linux-libre@nongnu.org bill-auger wrote: > On Sun, 17 Feb 2019 23:33:06 +0100 Ricardo wrote: >> I don=E2=80=99t feel motivated to apologize to the people involved in=20 >> PureOS >> because I wasn=E2=80=99t around when they were pressured / convinced to= =20 >> drop >> Chromium. > > no, but you could have been around - you also could have argued=20 > for > pureos on their side of the debate, and perhaps won favor for=20 > chromium > at that time; so that none of us would need to be discussing it=20 > today, > nor ever again - but unfortunately, it is true, you did not do=20 > that - > so here we are today, raking this ugly old thing out of the mud=20 > once > again If this is the quality of argument that =E2=80=98won=E2=80=99 over PureOS, = it's=20 blaming Guix/Ricardo for not being around to stop others from=20 being bullied. Kind regards, T G-R