From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:57:02 +0100
Message-ID: <87wo89imsx.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <9251b0f558ee90be48420e76d7c4d326@riseup.net>
 <878skpacih.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38873)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1j6vJZ-0007NU-BE
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 06:57:22 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1j6vJY-0006yq-Aj
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 06:57:21 -0500
Received: from sender4-of-o51.zoho.com ([136.143.188.51]:21101)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1j6vJX-0006tY-UT
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 06:57:20 -0500
In-reply-to: <878skpacih.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel"
 <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: 33844@debbugs.gnu.org, guix-devel@gnu.org


Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz> writes:

> swedebugia@riseup.net writes:
>
>> Reason: it is used standalone to convert between formats.
>
> I agree.  What do other people think?

I agree.

We should also rename all uses of ghc-pandoc in the same patch.

--
Ricardo