From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id IPu8CbFJYl+MCAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 17:21:53 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id mOOrBbFJYl+9aQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 17:21:53 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14591940609 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 17:21:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:54016 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIb7u-0005bF-S0 for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 13:21:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40270) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIb7k-0005aw-7v for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 13:21:40 -0400 Received: from sender4-of-o51.zoho.com ([136.143.188.51]:21107) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIb7i-0000gP-88 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 13:21:39 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1600276894; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=lGsOaz1FrjTybqQdHRgGR06lUlmTscnzjhs9NP0Wo/w0Snnt1VkdEgBLmC7wJzXJxAD2Rbk+wP1HA1P5NOioLm56ByarpNGCbVtlLPwi9SzY2XARkzpZX7Oz1sR7d6szvq3Y0kZ2fYlEoI5hIruuNq5iWN2/C6uav8eB6DtNs20= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1600276894; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=zdGPUoQIRjek5NyexatGN4e5r2CPH2TyA/zVo3yroIM=; b=n+rp9LSBNrZZ2c6gmZsY8sEf4iViiyvyFsgStDK//y/uNTUQi9m7UfKD3wqyxwZ4QTn88z6x7e0gBtD3gEa6Gb5Ct3LNxhfktGS7kK2OFFSz5OY5X/YZtgwZSTNvsR+rMc4rCDN3ppHPKqarzWWcfL2rU5yPREEe7IAc0+Gorcg= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1600276894; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=zdGPUoQIRjek5NyexatGN4e5r2CPH2TyA/zVo3yroIM=; b=BDYxmr3oiDxNYAcosTRBIksvf/pLL2J/OPlN0eUVDvd1rGK2a3CD9WBreXrIRh/X wNATm0qWIK5GEoD8E54iMWV+AJrKFA0KrspaVlA5bMK3Xi0hSmcwUr0SVbx0IRjDISa EzXGEOuPmyv0Nb6iLdG37k/v98NvCenbbw2rP8Mw= Received: from localhost (p54ad4084.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.64.132]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1600276893467476.511572183981; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 10:21:33 -0700 (PDT) References: <87zh5pvj64.fsf@elephly.net> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: zimoun Subject: Re: [OUTREACHY] toward a proposal? In-reply-to: X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 19:22:50 +0200 Message-ID: <87wo0tvdp1.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External Received-SPF: pass client-ip=136.143.188.51; envelope-from=rekado@elephly.net; helo=sender4-of-o51.zoho.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/16 11:20:28 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix Devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=elephly.net header.s=zoho header.b=BDYxmr3o; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 2.99 X-TUID: PBWuCY/lU/qZ zimoun writes: > Thank you for explaining. > > On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 17:23, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > >> >> > The proposal is to implement the same result hiding all the plumbing >> >> > details, i.e., >> >> > >> >> > guix git log --oneline | grep msmtp > >> On the Outreachy website you need to get an account in order to request >> to become a (co-)mentor. The =E2=80=9Ccommunity managers=E2=80=9D (I th= ink this >> includes me) then approve that. > > Do you think the proposal is a good one for an Outreachy project? Yes! I suggested on IRC that we should do the IPFS project as part of Outreachy to encourage implementation of the missing pieces. >> At this point you can write the proposal on the Outreachy website. This >> will again need to be approved in the end. We need to have a written >> proposal in the Outreachy system before the next round begins. >> Outreachy is a bit stricter in that regard than GSoC where it=E2=80=99s >> sufficient to have a vague project idea on some website. This is >> generally a good thing, because it facilitates more successful projects >> with fewer sub-projects that nobody ever thought through (which is a bad >> thing to discover one third into the internship). > > Is this again approvement done by the "community managers" or by another = board? Yes. The idea is that there will be a large number of proposals but only enough funding for one or two interns. IIRC internship candidates then pick a project they=E2=80=99d like to work on and eventually we decide together with the mentors whom to accept for the internships. So it could be that there will only be one suitable internship candidate who picked another project =E2=80=94 in that case the IPFS project would not go forward as an Outreachy internship. If we=E2=80=99re lucky, though, we=E2= =80=99ll get enough suitable candidates so that all proposed projects can go forward. --=20 Ricardo