From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id FcFqOXLZfl+bYAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 09:18:42 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id UEvQNHLZfl+DTwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 09:18:42 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 064A394051F for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 09:18:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:48610 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQS4O-0006dO-BB for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 05:18:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51192) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQS4B-0006d1-8f for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 05:18:27 -0400 Received: from tobias.gr ([2a02:c205:2020:6054::1]:47080) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQS48-00044G-PA for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 05:18:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobias.gr; s=2018; bh=1vlmzz0NlQ6o/lZ/yJxyv2epJlRE35hcOr+ZwLVy4jc=; h=date:in-reply-to: references:subject:cc:to:from; b=It9HkuQ88Smhgu93FvR05VSTMr++nLd6utbD5 XlnghTTVLKqjWGbxyW+fjuaSG102aCfsnDRaMrJJorvednJI04qNvLdrL57FkTMq9qvmu4 fDA5JqpTTl/CpKFQ8Bf3orSVIy/ow6LOaqmH6J5C+arMS3wCGI3N5kQyfhdyZNNrkXJyMb LB51f70g8lNez33stueVzfhUD9F8FwOL73Ln0cbqWIqqLMpv/fb92Sy+lPd7NHpnuBrsfc /KkRByT4rsUuIFDdbsmbyg1kxfE8hL0oF+sBhed4wKSrMpvF4mF/sCtosvxNnU52njERML 9Z02vZiVV9J/SxAdlSwnqDsZA== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id dca3da93 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Thu, 8 Oct 2020 09:18:27 +0000 (UTC) BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default; From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: Giovanni Biscuolo Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: commit 62035656ca: Add opensmtpd-filter-dkimsign. References: <87sgbxdgfx.fsf@roquette.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> In-reply-to: <87sgbxdgfx.fsf@roquette.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2020 11:18:08 +0200 Message-ID: <87wo01dqjz.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@tobias.gr; helo=tobias.gr X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=tobias.gr header.s=2018 header.b=It9HkuQ8; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=tobias.gr; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.31 X-TUID: JdiD/6knaT5S --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Gio', Somehow I missed this message. Sorry about that. Giovanni Biscuolo =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > looking at your recent addition (cool!) I found that your commit=20 > also > upgrades nix to 2.3.7, probably by mistake. Yup. > I don't know if there is a policy in cases like this: should we=20 > revert > that commit and split in two commits? Nope. It shouldn't happen, of course, but IMO once it's done it's=20 done (assuming it didn't break Nix, of course). Thanks for paying attention! T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCX37ZUA0cbWVAdG9iaWFz LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15t2ABALonb7Tuj81nKuvrrMwIkLTQ2LuQ6Rx9aUN9QOvo iPYdAP46hiMcfIIUx3rwYcrnag5rh/A7J3vufDZjye/rtndKAQ== =auOV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--