From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id wMCTBNOSs1/9HAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:07:31 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id QFV0ANOSs1+EYAAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:07:31 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B48559402B0 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:07:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:56996 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kewxV-0006cP-OA for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 04:07:29 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41562) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kewwz-0006a4-VL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 04:06:58 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50791) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kewwz-0001xU-8F; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 04:06:57 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:19b:d9a0:3036:7cf3:6a95:6495] (port=53518 helo=cervin) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kewwx-0004dS-Aa; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 04:06:56 -0500 From: Mathieu Othacehe To: Miguel =?utf-8?Q?=C3=81ngel?= Arruga Vivas Subject: Re: GNU Guix 1.2.0rc1 available for testing! References: <87d00hchij.fsf@gnu.org> <20201115191618.zuvkz65o3kcahfoz@pelzflorian.localdomain> <874klqb82u.fsf@gnu.org> <20201115231643.7mslq2sjzliv4nfd@pelzflorian.localdomain> <87v9e5ll7a.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6vhxpxl.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 10:06:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87a6vhxpxl.fsf@gmail.com> ("Miguel =?utf-8?Q?=C3=81ngel?= Arruga Vivas"'s message of "Mon, 16 Nov 2020 16:49:10 +0100") Message-ID: <87wnykxsgj.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.51 X-TUID: 6JCskKdomMVS Hello Miguel, > I didn't update my mail so often and you've already solved it... Sorry > for the noise and thank you for the patch. :-) Thanks for having a look to this :). I sent an updated patch because the first one could cause a regression in "non-install-devices" procedure I think. This procedure tries to find the install device by checking which devices are busy using "with-delay-device-in-use?". Turns out it doesn't work for me, plus it would now took a longer time if the delay is higher. In the updated patch, I removed the "with-delay-device-in-use?" call from "non-install-devices", adding a note saying that it would be nice to fix this procedure anyway. What do you think about that? Thanks, Mathieu