From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id GH4CAzGwI2DNdgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 10:06:41 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id 6OCIOjCwI2AUYwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 10:06:40 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B2AB9403E6 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 10:06:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:37186 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9mON-0005OF-Bd for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 05:06:39 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36146) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9mOD-0005Lo-Eq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 05:06:29 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41064) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9mOC-0001BQ-12; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 05:06:28 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:19b:d9a0:3165:bcdf:e1b3:a08d] (port=58988 helo=cervin) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l9mO1-0001Qj-Cl; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 05:06:26 -0500 From: Mathieu Othacehe To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: Staging branch [substitute availability] References: <87y2gd8k2v.fsf@gnu.org> <878s8dnpg4.fsf@gnu.org> <87im7gjgwz.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1lorjd6.fsf@elephly.net> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:06:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87r1lorjd6.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Tue, 09 Feb 2021 23:01:25 +0100") Message-ID: <87wnvg2q5k.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.86 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 8B2AB9403E6 X-Spam-Score: -2.86 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: WkKIXfJDJVLL Hello, > Yes, this should be okay. Does this mean that we can get rid of all the > other ports that we previously requested? Yes, the SSH tunnels and the associated open ports shouldn't be useful anymore, as we'll be able to route all the build nodes traffic through the VPN. > If you=E2=80=99re sure that it should be UDP port 51820 for incoming conn= ections > (and outgoing as well?) then I=E2=80=99ll submit the request. Yes, UDP 51820 for incoming and outgoing connections would be fine. > Sorry again for the delay! Feel free to ping me directly in the future. No worries, thanks for your reply! Mathieu