From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id OL3dE6vblmTwkQAASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 14:03:55 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id mGKrE6vblmTKcQAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 14:03:55 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E214C2594F for ; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 14:03:54 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1687608234; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=v3hynLn+V0SBJW4K0Y5o/uIbjOubKW/jSAtg2u72vtM=; b=Wifeno3AFdATmjIVXAD0cRVu5NmkYJVgvJZXq9LqFzWRcGbp9VDW9yan46vEEN9RjU6Szr oiPrGw8uqzF0zenBsoM0SRH0Jq3KE2KlgK+YbgF3zRVgYittqag6tXfqfLSu0OM1VbZAUY RipzTlJCmwn6e2dvLj9KWiysd+u0zzhl5dgvp9qPNCJIhnr8xK8ynh33Ph5yYI9IQt0eLG BlcFjPFJWKG1QSys9NRJh4ktbZRysF2aJpLIr4um7w07zZGxM8dEOFjud0gj+WsKGG1yt1 s+oFk9IEjgSlvOqwioA5J6TzReJvegNCK0mWuxV3pjpSo0DY8krznYZktjSVVA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1687608234; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=aZuTstQP+EQeObed5MLZeCca4medHq6jR+rJZLJ3X/Sf7xwJIPsRAq/Dfd7q8jHKHP7wb9 M7Gxfh7/4LwnDYCVoNXyhB2QOXT9gUsJyqvHodWowRN7T7bRshBTe6eZmRQONClUihWeDI SrJOdFVb0WIjs8qyTfY7P8nJb7XJ2IgR+OkAuuEhpubNreW8RpzgEsHxemk0POQqCgzNwz jtMhaReRsOCDmMdDr02ohM9VC8rIIpg9MIsVkzojfb/vc0ZP/ZicHDLfAFfWmesxI9D21+ 7AfRJ8fwhSAAFfIanJl7eq1mHDptXJqoIEWfuSuZaaIpzeFF+Qyf3gsukFUy/w== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qD1yv-0005v4-GD; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 08:03:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qD1yt-0005uZ-CU for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 08:03:07 -0400 Received: from 1.mo575.mail-out.ovh.net ([46.105.41.146]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qD1yq-0005sm-S8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 08:03:07 -0400 Received: from director10.ghost.mail-out.ovh.net (unknown [10.109.138.76]) by mo575.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F117725751 for ; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 12:02:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ghost-submission-6684bf9d7b-wwk69 (unknown [10.110.115.90]) by director10.ghost.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 851391FD45; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 12:02:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ngraves.fr ([37.59.142.103]) by ghost-submission-6684bf9d7b-wwk69 with ESMTPSA id doaBFHPblmQ1jgEANKcNTQ (envelope-from ); Sat, 24 Jun 2023 12:02:59 +0000 X-OVh-ClientIp: 90.70.56.140 To: Csepp Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: Maybe a way to get a few more developpers to work on Guix ? In-Reply-To: <87h6qxyv2m.fsf@riseup.net> References: <87h6qzzll7.fsf@ngraves.fr> <87h6qxyv2m.fsf@riseup.net> Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2023 14:02:58 +0200 Message-ID: <87wmztqd8t.fsf@ngraves.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 15812982717038912053 X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 0 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrgeegjedggeejucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfdpvefjgfevmfevgfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecuhedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvfevufgjfhffkfggtgesthdtredttddttdenucfhrhhomheppfhitgholhgrshcuifhrrghvvghsuceonhhgrhgrvhgvshesnhhgrhgrvhgvshdrfhhrqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeduudegffekheegueeggfdtuedtgffhhfeifeelfeelvdeijeeuhffhfeeflefgtdenucffohhmrghinhepsghpihhfrhgrnhgtvgdrfhhrpdhlihhmihhtvggurdhshihsthgvmhhsnecukfhppeduvdejrddtrddtrddupdeltddrjedtrdehiedrudegtddpfeejrdehledrudegvddruddtfeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpeduvdejrddtrddtrddupdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepoehnghhrrghvvghssehnghhrrghvvghsrdhfrheqpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedupdhrtghpthhtohepghhuihigqdguvghvvghlsehgnhhurdhorhhgpdfovfetjfhoshhtpehmohehjeehpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuth Received-SPF: pass client-ip=46.105.41.146; envelope-from=ngraves@ngraves.fr; helo=1.mo575.mail-out.ovh.net X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Nicolas Graves From: Nicolas Graves via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.85 X-Spam-Score: -4.85 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: E214C2594F X-TUID: Gqa/pYfjPNKL On 2023-06-24 13:08, Csepp wrote: > Nicolas Graves via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." writes: > >> https://www.bpifrance.fr/nos-appels-a-projets-concours/appel-a-projets-communs-numeriques-pour-lintelligence-artificielle-generative >> >> Here's a call for proposal in French which could match a Guix project >> with a focus on code generation through LLMs. This could itself help >> Guix generate (and fix) package definitions. > > Mandatory reading for anyone interested in this: > https://limited.systems/articles/climate-cost-of-ai-revolution/ I fully agree on that as well. I don't think training a full-fetched LLM is nowhere worth it, but I've heard that just fine-tuning an open model with quantized weights might get the job done training and energy costs down to a few hundred bucks. > IMHO LLMs for Guix are so damn not worth the effort. It will not fix > any of the actual issues with Guix, like the huge performance gap > between it and traditional package managers. I've also opened another discussion on the subject on guix-devel recently. Do you have any benchmark material to back this up? -- Best regards, Nicolas Graves