From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: MIPS64/N64 support Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 13:25:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87vc1hutak.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8738onkyi9.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87bo3asfx6.fsf@karetnikov.org> <87fvsmgtsm.fsf@gnu.org> <87mwmuhtb3.fsf@karetnikov.org> <20131001070942.GV1965@vicerveza.homeunix.net> <87li2dv3bz.fsf@karetnikov.org> <20131001080318.GW1965@vicerveza.homeunix.net> <87ob79e5eu.fsf@karetnikov.org> <20131001093009.GX1965@vicerveza.homeunix.net> <87zjqtb90x.fsf@karetnikov.org> <20131001100420.GZ1965@vicerveza.homeunix.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53670) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VQyAB-000881-8y for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 07:30:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VQyA5-000804-4r for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 07:30:47 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:48898) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VQyA4-0007zb-V6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 07:30:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20131001100420.GZ1965@vicerveza.homeunix.net> (=?utf-8?Q?=22?= =?utf-8?Q?Llu=C3=ADs?= Batlle i Rossell"'s message of "Tue, 1 Oct 2013 12:04:20 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?Llu=C3=ADs?= Batlle i Rossell Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Llu=C3=ADs Batlle i Rossell skribis: > On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 02:06:06PM +0400, Nikita Karetnikov wrote: >> > I also seem to recall that gNewSense had only o32 support, years >> > ago. And not any n32/n64. Can it be? >>=20 >> I think this is correct. >>=20 >> > I'd simply try to avoid ext4 or even ext3, without changing the kernel= . I don't >> > know of linux-libre, but you need something newer than 3.7 I think, to= get the >> > ext* fix. >>=20 >> OK, what do you recommend: Ext2 or something else? > > In theory, anything should work. :) > I'd personally go for reiserfs or jfs. Llu=C3=ADs is an ext[234] skeptic, so take it with a grain of salt. ;-) More importantly: Llu=C3=ADs, is there a Linux configuration option to enab= le n64 support? How does that work? Ludo=E2=80=99.