From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich =?utf-8?Q?Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1?=
	=?utf-8?Q?=2FKammer?=)
Subject: Re: Planning for 0.8.2
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 10:51:50 +0200
Message-ID: <87vbglq57d.fsf@taylan.uni.cx>
References: <87k2xx88in.fsf@inria.fr> <87pp6xyxmz.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87fv7qbhat.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60999)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <taylanbayirli@gmail.com>) id 1YlZL0-0006k0-SK
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 04:51:55 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <taylanbayirli@gmail.com>) id 1YlZKz-0002hB-Lj
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 04:51:54 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87fv7qbhat.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Fri, 24 Apr 2015 00:39:38 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes:

> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) skribis:
>
>> For those I=E2=80=99ve just reopened core-updates with the intent of fre=
ezing it
>> in a couple of days or so.  The changes should be limited to:
>>
>>   1. ld-wrapper bugs fixed (just pushed);
>>
>>   2. libstdc++ not having libgcc_s in its RUNPATH (bug #20358);
>>
>>   3. #:validate-runpath? turned on by default for all the build systems
>>      (currently it=E2=80=99s only gnu-build-system); more broken package=
s will
>>      become apparent as a result;
>>
>>   4. libc=E2=80=99s own message catalogs are installed (just pushed).
>>
>> I think Eric has a small Perl patch that would be welcome, but that=E2=
=80=99s
>> about it.
>
> I=E2=80=99m done with these.  If everything is OK, we may want to enable =
the
> whole set of packages for build on Hydra in the next few days (Mark?).
>
> Ludo=E2=80=99.

There's news on the Qt 5.4/i686 front.  I applied the patch linked to in
<https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-45205> locally and will try
building it now, which should take ~7 hours on my machine IIRC.

Excited for the release. :-)

Taylan