From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: guile-next: Update to 20151025.e5bccb6 Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 23:34:56 +0100 Message-ID: <87vb9tqmwf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a8r5igzs.fsf@dustycloud.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54727) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZqqM4-00037X-4f for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 18:35:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZqqLz-0006pQ-2e for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 18:35:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87a8r5igzs.fsf@dustycloud.org> (Christopher Allan Webber's message of "Mon, 26 Oct 2015 14:08:39 -0500") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Christopher Allan Webber Cc: guix-devel Christopher Allan Webber skribis: > BTW, should I be requesting commit access for smaller changes like this, > like updating version numbers? Sure, hereby granted! :-) See =E2=80=9CCommit Access=E2=80=9D for the rule= s. > From 3655de659692d40a0ad9d61e7aad2967e20515bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Christopher Allan Webber > Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 14:04:56 -0500 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: guile-next: Update to 20151025.e5bccb6 > > * gnu/packages/guile.scm (guile-next): Update to 20151025.e5bccb6. OK, please push. Thank you & happy hacking! Ludo=E2=80=99.