From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: boost: Update to 1.60.0
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 21:21:43 +0100
Message-ID: <87vb6yblbc.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <4a857e1ce13cf2f7377ec5f257ea1691@openmailbox.org>
	<87a8ojhuhc.fsf@gnu.org> <20160106084907.2db0aac3@PocketWee>
	<87a8oie4ic.fsf@gnu.org> <20160110221820.GA25032@debian>
	<87pox8zd8z.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvsan28w.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37065)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1aJ5Rt-0005K7-Jr
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 15:21:50 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1aJ5Rq-0000CR-Dj
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 15:21:49 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87mvsan28w.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Tue, 12 Jan 2016 18:20:31 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Eric Bavier <ericbavier@openmailbox.org>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) skribis:

> I cannot really decipher libs/context/build/Jamfile.v2, but I can see
> that the only mentions of MIPS in there relate to the o32 ABI, whereas
> we target n32.
>
> Another thing that=E2=80=99s fishy in the build log is that, at the begin=
ning of
> the build phase, we see:
>
> Component configuration:
>
>     - atomic                   : building
>     - chrono                   : building
>     - container                : building
>     - context                  : not building
>     - coroutine                : not building
>
> Yet it attempts to build =E2=80=98context=E2=80=99.

Looking more closely, this may be due to the =E2=80=98coroutine2=E2=80=99 c=
omponent that
the recipe did not explicitly disable, unlike =E2=80=98coroutine=E2=80=99. =
 We=E2=80=99ll see.

I=E2=80=99ve made this change and pushed the changes to =E2=80=98master=E2=
=80=99.

Ludo=E2=80=99.