From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add MilkyTracker to Guix Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:26:46 +0200 Message-ID: <87vb46ispl.fsf@elephly.net> References: <6dae35698781717e6043be7086b6f63c@openmailbox.org> <20160327072337.GA13339@debian-netbook> <20160327230935.14e8ba5a@openmailbox.org> <87shzayj69.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32811) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1akYCY-0006V5-NK for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 10:31:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1akYCV-0008UZ-Gw for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 10:31:30 -0400 Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:24908) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1akYCV-0008TS-8m for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 10:31:27 -0400 In-reply-to: <87shzayj69.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Alex Kost Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Alex Kost writes: > Kei Yamashita (2016-03-28 06:09 +0300) wrote: > >> On Sun, 27 Mar 2016 10:23:37 +0300 >> Efraim Flashner wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 07:54:40PM -0400, kei@openmailbox.org wrote: > [...] >>> > + (arguments >>> > + '(#:configure-flags `("--without-alsa" "--without-jack"))) >>> >>> In addition to Nil's comments, I was wondering about the configure >>> flags. Wouldn't it make sense to have either alsa or jack as an input? >> >> Milkytracker works fine without it on my machine. I feel like it's a >> matter of allowing the user options or sticking to the minimal build. > > In my understanding (I may be wrong) our policy is to provide > full-featured software, so the features shouldn't be disabled without a > reason. Sometimes we add minimal packages (e.g., "bash-minimal", > "cups-minimal") if they are needed, but this is not such a case. > > So I think you should remove these --without-… flags. And thanks for > contributing! I agree. Also, JACK and ALSA are ubiquitous among Guix audio/music packages. When the programme comes with support for ALSA and JACK backends by default I think we should not disable it. ~~ Ricardo