From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] gnu: Add emacs-smex.
Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2016 22:03:18 +0200
Message-ID: <87vb1npfnd.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20160601140538.20311-1-dthompson2@worcester.edu>
	<87vb1slz61.fsf@gmail.com>
	<CAJ=Rwfb1cJN2KKUO4y1QhrJ561zaStdk5DMLpV7TUKUHJw+3eQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87eg8e4rkw.fsf@gnu.org> <5751739E.6030909@uq.edu.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49286)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1b9eGf-0002BP-W0
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2016 16:03:30 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1b9eGe-0003fH-3J
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2016 16:03:28 -0400
In-Reply-To: <5751739E.6030909@uq.edu.au> (Ben Woodcroft's message of "Fri, 3
	Jun 2016 22:10:06 +1000")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ben Woodcroft <b.woodcroft@uq.edu.au>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>, Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>, David Thompson <davet@gnu.org>

Ben Woodcroft <b.woodcroft@uq.edu.au> skribis:

> On 06/03/2016 06:14 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:

[...]

>> I think the downside is that the GitHub updater won=E2=80=99t be able to
>> identify these, although I=E2=80=99m not 100% sure of that.
>
> I haven't actually tested but I would think that is right
> Ludo.

Indeed:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
scheme@(guile-user)> ,use(guix upstream)
scheme@(guile-user)> ,use(guix import github)
scheme@(guile-user)> ,use(gnu packages emacs)
scheme@(guile-user)> (package-update-path emacs-smex (list %github-updater))
$2 =3D #f
scheme@(guile-user)> ((upstream-updater-latest %github-updater) emacs-smex)
$3 =3D #f
scheme@(guile-user)> ((upstream-updater-predicate %github-updater) emacs-sm=
ex)
$4 =3D #f
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

> However, I expect this issue is solvable with modifications to the
> GitHub updater.

Yeah, we should probably do it eventually.

Thanks for your feedback,
Ludo=E2=80=99.