From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Kost Subject: Re: mingw guile.exe cross build patch series v9 Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 14:03:40 +0300 Message-ID: <87vaz8ansj.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20160809064139.27872-1-janneke@gnu.org> <87h9augx91.fsf@igalia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41100) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXRIY-00047H-8F for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:03:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXRIU-0003d3-54 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:03:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87h9augx91.fsf@igalia.com> (Andy Wingo's message of "Tue, 09 Aug 2016 10:30:34 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Andy Wingo Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Andy Wingo (2016-08-09 11:30 +0300) wrote: > On Tue 09 Aug 2016 08:41, Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > >> Finally I have the next iteration ready. After adressing all comments on v8 >> and rebasing, the patches only built on core-updates. I spent a some time to >> find the problem with master and cherry-picking from core-updates before >> giving up. >> >> Now that core-updates has been merged the mingw cross patches build again. > > All looks fine to me, though Alex's nits are good of course I'd be happy > to have this in Guix and then we work on it some more in place. Note > that Guile 2.0 should now support `open-pipe' with MinGW and thus we > will need a static-bash at some point. I don't think Guix has updated > to that Guile yet though, and probably we need to roll a new release > actually to fix a couple more MinGW things. If you mean Guile 2.0.12, Ludovic mentioned this update recently: -- Alex