From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ng0 <ngillmann@runbox.com>
Subject: Re: Cosmetical change: remove inconsistent "$file ends here"?
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2016 19:18:30 +0000
Message-ID: <87vax5e16h.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
References: <871t09t6f1.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87a8ewl6tq.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87zims4dwu.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50095)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>) id 1bsECD-0001dn-TZ
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2016 15:19:10 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>) id 1bsECB-0001e0-TR
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2016 15:19:08 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87zims4dwu.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>, Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> ng0 (2016-09-24 20:00 +0000) wrote:
>>
>>> We should either be consistent with this in all files or remove this
>>> altogether in my opinion.
>>>
>>>> ng0@shadowwalker ~/src/guix/guix-no-changes$ egrep -nr "ends here"
>>>> gnu/build/vm.scm:323:;;; vm.scm ends here
>> ...
>>> What do you think?
>>
>> I don't know what the original purpose of this convention is, it was
>> probably invented in those ancient times when dinosaurs walked by
>> streets, but I kinda like these "ends here" things :-)
>
> Yeah, I add them occasionally out of habit, but it’s not useful.
>
>> Anyway, I vote for leaving them and adding the missing ones.
>
> I vote for the status quo.  :-)  There’s not much value in spending time
> either way IMO.
>
> Ludo’.
>

Okay, let's keep it this way. There's nothing to be gained from this.