From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: indent with emacs batch mode
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2017 16:48:06 +0300
Message-ID: <87vatp1x49.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87y3yocil2.fsf@elephly.net> <87inpr8l6y.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87pojyzi24.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgumd0ro.fsf@elephly.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35939)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1cQDpU-0001Qg-34
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2017 08:48:13 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1cQDpR-0006ip-15
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2017 08:48:12 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87lgumd0ro.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Sat,
	07 Jan 2017 22:21:31 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

Ricardo Wurmus (2017-01-07 22:21 +0100) wrote:

> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com> skribis:
>>
>>> Since a user knows what file (s)he wants modify, I think it is better to
>>> avoid starting the REPL, so it will be *much faster*.  After all, I
>>> would do it like this:
>>
>> Sounds cool!  (The only downside is that it would indent the whole file
>> so the submitter might have to undo indentation changes in other parts
>> of the file before committing.)
>
> But we=E2=80=99re using =E2=80=9Cindent-sexp=E2=80=9D, which only indents=
 the expression that
> belongs to the matched package name.

Right, Ludo you missunderstood: only the specified package will be
indented.

>> What about committing it as a script, say
>> etc/devel/indent-scheme-code.sh, and mention it under =E2=80=9CSubmitting
>> Patches=E2=80=9D and =E2=80=9CFormatting Code=E2=80=9D?
>
> Sounds good to me.  Alex, would you like to do it?

Sorry, I wouldn't :-)

--=20
Alex