From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: bug#25463: guile-2.0.13 Check errors Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 22:18:02 +0100 Message-ID: <87vasfqfat.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4f693f6528e76a93e17e73450e2bc320@openmailbox.org> <87vasg1luf.fsf@gnu.org> <6f657e5c558f7594b14d50dea55f79bd@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50242) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cd1XD-0007mK-6J for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 16:18:16 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cd1XB-0005TS-S8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 16:18:15 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Manolis Ragkousis's message of "Sun, 12 Feb 2017 15:44:36 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Manolis Ragkousis Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, rennes@openmailbox.org, Richard Braun , 25463@debbugs.gnu.org Hello! Manolis Ragkousis skribis: > Locally on Hurd I am using this patch > http://paste.lisp.org/display/338954 on the glibc/hurd package to work > around that test failure. Ideally we need to modify the way guile > handles time.[1] Does =E2=80=98glibc/hurd=E2=80=99 have this patch in =E2=80=98core-updates= =E2=80=99? Should it? Would it make sense to address this issue in Guile instead of libc, Richard? I guess the answer depends on how many programs make this assumption besides Guile. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.