From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Staying on-topic
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2017 22:15:25 +0200
Message-ID: <87vaqm8t2a.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20170323054600.GA18841@jocasta.intra>
	<CAJ98PDyyuWX-tV4=b3sQTOji5f=d9jPymHnnX8UThBYaVMzt+g@mail.gmail.com>
	<87pogxcl13.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <877f33hj7i.fsf_-_@gnu.org>
	<87inmnc9x2.fsf@gmail.com> <87bmsesy2a.fsf@dustycloud.org>
	<87efxad48h.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42599)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1culuN-00022Q-Sr
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2017 16:15:32 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1culuK-00068h-OO
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2017 16:15:31 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87efxad48h.fsf@gmail.com> ("Taylan Ulrich
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?\=5C\=22Ba\?\=
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?y\=C4\=B1rl\=C4\=B1\=2FKammer\=5C\=22\=22's\?\=
	message of "Sun, 02 Apr 2017 21:00:30 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Taylan Ulrich =?utf-8?Q?=22Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1?=
	=?utf-8?Q?=2FKammer=22?= <taylanbayirli@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

Hi Taylan,

taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer") skribis:

> If the project takes this ideological side, then it effectively excludes
> some women who find this to be sexist.

The code of conduct is here because =E2=80=9Cwe pledge to respect all peopl=
e who
contribute=E2=80=9D; that=E2=80=99s all it=E2=80=99s about, period.  It is =
*explicitly* not
about excluding anyone because of their gender.

Discussions of the code of conduct should indeed take place here, but
what you=E2=80=99re talking about is simply off-topic: it has nothing to do=
 with
the development of Guix nor with the project=E2=80=99s code of conduct.

Please, take this discussion elsewhere.

Thanks in advance,
Ludo=E2=80=99.