From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Any objections to removing linux-libre@4.1? Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2017 23:19:10 +0200 Message-ID: <87vaobfo35.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wp8suvs4.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34352) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHcvf-0003Ax-HC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 17:19:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dHcva-0006J1-Kg for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jun 2017 17:19:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87wp8suvs4.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Sun, 04 Jun 2017 02:11:39 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Mark H Weaver skribis: > Does anyone here still need linux-libre@4.1 in Guix? If not, I'd like > to remove it. > > Upstream security updates for it seem to be quite infrequent (2.5 months > between the last two releases), and the recent update to 4.1.40 > neglected to include a fix for CVE-2017-6074, which does not inspire > confidence. > > What do you think? No objection from me. Thank you, Ludo=E2=80=99.