From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Xorg tearing fix on Intel HD Graphics 4000
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 22:47:42 -0700
Message-ID: <87vank7h4x.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <877f053hc7.fsf@gnu.org> <87k24539rz.fsf@elephly.net>
	<87d19xwjxe.fsf@gnu.org> <87h8z9jlvk.fsf@netris.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39948)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <cmmarusich@gmail.com>) id 1dP0Oj-0001f8-Bk
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 01:47:50 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <cmmarusich@gmail.com>) id 1dP0Og-0006kV-AV
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 01:47:49 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87h8z9jlvk.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Wed, 21
	Jun 2017 13:23:11 -0400")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> writes:

> However, your proposed workaround is not a proper fix, and I don't think
> we should apply it system-wide in Guix.

Can you elaborate on why it is not a proper fix?  It isn't obvious to
me.

=2D-=20
Chris

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=KH5O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--