From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: Express Logic claims GUIX trademark Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 15:33:29 +0100 Message-ID: <87va0ob1s6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a7i1jkxr.fsf@nckx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43079) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h3iTJ-0008Bu-0u for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 10:33:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87a7i1jkxr.fsf@nckx> (Tobias Geerinckx-Rice's message of "Mon, 11 Mar 2019 20:00:16 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hello, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice skribis: > It took me all of 20 seconds to find the actual GUIX trademark > registration[1], so we can stop basing this discussion on regrettable > typographical choices in press releases. > > It's 4 months old. > > Meanwhile, we have: > > commit 207cba8114d354737b231e510d6110ea2a42e07b > Author: Ludovic Court=C3=A8s > Date: Wed Apr 18 23:21:11 2012 +0200 > > Initial commit. Indeed. The other GUIX is older than this registration (we discussed it before=C2= =B9) but I know it=E2=80=99s younger than Guix. Overall I=E2=80=99m not really = concerned, and no we won=E2=80=99t change names just in case. We asked for legal advice a while back. I suggest to continue this discussion off-list though. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. =C2=B9 https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2014-12/msg00165.html