From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id qLMOLFIve18GFgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 14:36:02 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id KHLoJ1Ive1/pKwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 14:36:02 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EB769404E1 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 14:36:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:50428 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kPRaq-0006QA-SA for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 10:36:00 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36572) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kPRai-0006Pz-0J for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 10:35:52 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:34539) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kPRaf-0005f8-9s for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2020 10:35:51 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1EF72400FC for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 16:35:46 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1601908546; bh=F6MkqFe8nZn90lCBQTriWICBk/Hbas8WmAm61Hk+4w8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=ia4I4BwxsVCK6OQm8YTyCpmW2V6wuX/7NZBcNYH4kyTsOlniffi/CDgZaJ4TaQdYL JcQwTB6aeCznNDojSq7gXMFjNEppa9yumrgCftwWhbXZH0XdaZJwPzorvEhORq4caD cLtziw6QWwmLR028BECNvJaf7Kwi1evmSkzgNDbJ3VtFru2ehDPdQJIblblJt64VAg 4NlVjWMeJQ2MZ+S4g1wy6cl7sE4fYLmPZhwBWu69xIHgHvkfT5Kr9g23+HF0fqQOTG uazh7QWzxZTBCl0PWyHvkfHCJghhdMlLbz7GwfD8QBd58C41MehjlJZitlBwh/KBiF vmnIgUx0ISz+Q== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4C4jnY0XgKz6tmG; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 16:35:44 +0200 (CEST) References: <87a6xeura2.fsf@yamatai> <877ds42760.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2kk7rni.fsf@yamatai> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 From: Guillaume Le Vaillant To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: Failing CI evaluation for staging branch In-reply-to: <87y2kk7rni.fsf@yamatai> Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 16:35:42 +0200 Message-ID: <87v9fo7nb5.fsf@yamatai> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=glv@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/05 09:01:58 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=ia4I4Bwx; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.31 X-TUID: 0IDxVs96kak5 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Guillaume Le Vaillant skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s skribis: > >> Hi Guillaume, >> >> Guillaume Le Vaillant skribis: >> >>> Currently no substitutes are built for the testing branch because the >>> evaluation fails. The log at https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/16794/log/raw >>> ends with: >> >> You mean the =E2=80=98staging=E2=80=99 branch? >> > > Yes, I meant 'staging'. I often type 'testing' instead of 'staging', > probably that pesky muscle memory!. > >>> guix/inferior.scm:247:2: ERROR: >>> 1. &inferior-exception: >>> [...] >>> >>> If I understand this correctly, there's a '#:builder' keyword somewhere >>> that is causing a problem. Does someone know where it can come from, or >>> how to fix the issue? >> >> Right. I=E2=80=99d look at guix/build-system/asdf.scm:279:2 on that bra= nch (per >> the inferior stack trace above). Does that give useful info? > > I didn't see any obvious problem in that file; the strange thing is that > 'make', 'make as-derivation' and './pre-inst-env guix build ...' all > work fine. > > In a local branch I merged the current master (3699ed6) into staging > (de96ed1) and I'm going to try to start a local cuirass daemon to see > wether I can reproduce the issue or not. > > Given that merging master in staging hasn't been done in a while, should > I also push my updated staging branch, or maybe someone is already > working on it? Ok, I started a local Cuirass, I reproduced the evaluation failure, and I think I found the problem: Cuirass was choking on the definition of the ecl-slynk package. I fixed it and know the evaluation has been 'In progress...' for 15 minutes. Then, if the evaluation completes successfully, and if there are no objections, I'll push the updated staging branch. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCX3svPg8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j8ZQwEAgf//p8nDFIVeFN0WJ4Bqw2oKE5T1zgrw9ZDq 2754hpAA/j1/h371Q/7KXX+V6ytngJhU9JSNKMb6rLAC8DUOdYWd =qzgB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--