From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id SAP+M4MM4l86dQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 15:10:59 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id cLPAL4MM4l/VVQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 15:10:59 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EF819402A9 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 15:10:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:46768 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1krjJS-0003LQ-BS for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 10:10:58 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59222) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1krjJK-0003Kc-6D; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 10:10:50 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59538) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1krjJI-0005G1-HN; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 10:10:48 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=44064 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1krjJI-0001pQ-44; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 10:10:48 -0500 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Subject: Re: wip-arm-bootstrap: Reduced binary seed bootstrap References: <87ft40vevv.fsf@gnu.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 2 =?utf-8?Q?Niv=C3=B4se?= an 229 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 16:10:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87ft40vevv.fsf@gnu.org> (Jan Nieuwenhuizen's message of "Sun, 20 Dec 2020 13:30:28 +0100") Message-ID: <87v9ctzxjd.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, bug-mes@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.82 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 5EF819402A9 X-Spam-Score: -2.82 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: qcKDWFt8LaLq Hello! Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis: > I pushed an initial wip-arm-bootstrap that builds up to tcc-boot: > > ./pre-inst-env guix build -e '(@@ (gnu packages commencement) tcc-boot)' > > > Danny did a terrific job on armhf-linux support for GNU Mes and we are > getting close to release v0.23. What's known to be missing is "setjmp" > support for tcc/gcc. And, of course, for the Reduced binary seed > bootstrap to work on ARM! Woohoo, thumbs up for this great milestone, hackers! =F0=9F=8E=89 > Anyway, the problem I'm looking at now is that while tcc-boot builds on > an ARM box, it does not build on aarch64-linux, i.e. this > > ./pre-inst-env guix build --system=3Darmhf-linux \ > -e '(@@ (gnu packages commencement) tcc-boot0)' > > fails on overdrive1. That=E2=80=99s =E2=80=9Cinteresting=E2=80=9D. Did you eventually find a le= ad? > configure: error: 'mescc' failed to compile conftest.c. > Backtrace: > In unknown file: > ?: 19 [apply-smob/1 #] > [..] > In gash/shell.scm: > 165: 1 [sh:exec-let () "./conftest" "triplet"] > In unknown file: > ?: 0 [execle "./conftest" # "./conftest" ...] > > ERROR: In procedure execle: > ERROR: In procedure execle: No such file or directory Looks like the ELF interpreter on =E2=80=98conftest=E2=80=99 might be wrong? Thanks for the update, it=E2=80=99s exciting! Ludo=E2=80=99.