Re: Staging branch [kwayland test failure]

Re: Staging branch [kwayland test failure]

[Leo Famulari]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 665 bytes --]

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 06:51:13PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> kwayland is definitely broken on x86_64, so wayland users are invited to
> fix it:
> 
> ------
> The following tests FAILED: 
>          26 - kwayland-testPlasmaWindowModel (Failed) 
> Errors while running CTest 
> make: *** [Makefile:112: test] Error 8
> ------

Slightly more specific info, from
"build/Testing/Temporary/LastTest.log":

------
FAIL!  : PlasmaWindowModelTest::testVirtualDesktops() '!dataChangedSpy.wait(100)' returned FALSE. ()
   Loc: [/tmp/guix-build-kwayland-5.70.0.drv-0/kwayland-5.70.0/autotests/client/test_plasma_window_model.cpp(588)]
------

Any ideas?

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: Staging branch [kwayland test failure]

[Guillaume Le Vaillant]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 172 bytes --]

It looks like the kwayland test failure on x86-64 doesn't happen all the time.
I just built it successfully on master and on staging by trying again
when the build failed.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 247 bytes --]

Re: Staging branch [kwayland test failure]

[Leo Famulari]

On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 11:26:52AM +0100, Guillaume Le Vaillant wrote:
> It looks like the kwayland test failure on x86-64 doesn't happen all the time.
> I just built it successfully on master and on staging by trying again
> when the build failed.

Thanks, that is useful info! I'll try building it some more, on a single
core, and maybe we'll just disable this test.

Re: Staging branch [kwayland test failure]

[Leo Famulari]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 600 bytes --]

On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 02:44:42PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 11:26:52AM +0100, Guillaume Le Vaillant wrote:
> > It looks like the kwayland test failure on x86-64 doesn't happen all the time.
> > I just built it successfully on master and on staging by trying again
> > when the build failed.
> 
> Thanks, that is useful info! I'll try building it some more, on a single
> core, and maybe we'll just disable this test.

It turns out, this package is broken (or flaky, at least) on the master
branch too. We should fix it, but it won't block the merge of staging.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]