From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id OMUkAczDWWB5BQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 10:32:44 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id YF19OMvDWWAjLQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 10:32:43 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3305A20319 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:32:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:56296 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOeL4-0007lX-1U for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 06:32:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42444) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOeKc-0007jd-KL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 06:32:14 -0400 Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:33642 helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOeKa-0006bU-H3; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 06:32:14 -0400 From: Xinglu Chen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1616495523; bh=A3Rl1ZVsGYqMLpjzF6KlwcoObSwN2Y9hSQx+hECDk4w=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=cxZgRPMLzYLxOJUTNVwMA6dixQpTwRLmGSVgoQ/nV9T3HYZ271L7Kq4PvVEKAdigN 3aSrDL3awbVjzafzKeUTv+Jyz5FyRGJi9UdvIJddV2r7hCwWgbcDMZmLDP9zOMvMrm dtq2HqJy+0Of3NKFV118j1w86+Ihgf6XcTESOHMY= To: zimoun , Guix Devel , Mathieu Othacehe Subject: Re: Release 1.2.1: Cuirass failed to build Haskell 179 packages In-Reply-To: <86v99ybup8.fsf@gmail.com> References: <86v99ybup8.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:32:02 +0100 Message-ID: <87v99iduu5.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=87.96.130.155; envelope-from=public@yoctocell.xyz; helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz X-Spam_score_int: 14 X-Spam_score: 1.4 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam_report: (1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD=0.5, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1.999, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1616495563; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=RTwNh2sZaSiCJPV6Cn+sQb8UzTphMTi/qhbRIRyprGc=; b=o4REI3NwYKAkacOjMDkymrZY/5RvjYbFC4hYtUXi/Aa1Zh2k9mtLMDriLl2T75cClFInd6 NDPmkcFqS2ZMvkVArBXXxkBjwQ8Dt7VrRO625sjIGoFPf4iK/3xyZB/Uk5/thL2otTR4Zq a5KVcKUNqptjG/EI2v7u2wgvxQx7Xw62g9ADUUORo6R5b5pPcDL2sbGf/YgdrLAYRq1Wj5 YoBWRzwituUEZWQeBTqd/u5egJn46pIWDxfab+YmK8IM72p/lQ2N7oOlDbRyK+yDYMnyKY PDMrtzW6cwHC0bbcMIEPeseQCprqCB3VdexEMSXBNW7quTrjZZfFggCODI5ZKw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1616495563; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Y8QmZzsH3PX50u8t6Gg7oyflqbDl1v1lodIBWRANo0k4/RO9llNqAurafrINlq3AGUG+Yn WhZ7u83ouRHDt5+sB5+QPomXPgjHS/X3b3NKtLygd/Tj+ec/DIyCdTgMgnsXGyG0uT730G 6Zcp8qQ73AHP53CNlnoVONihx1u0NXv0lRlfiB9cK9EonF5XmFSKJ/64olbwF+peQrBIf8 wlOoIODFEe/e2hZWhL2+MLo1Q0nUWTxwbmHGQOg2XdaTNncam6JBofHNWCetB0c9aENjUD d6ggNhWgVmU3HCVW25SO7ieNiSrCS1ScL11PoJjVhMSVgVhqtXMqDNqp5aephg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=yoctocell.xyz header.s=mail header.b=cxZgRPML; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=yoctocell.xyz; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.12 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=yoctocell.xyz header.s=mail header.b=cxZgRPML; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=yoctocell.xyz; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 3305A20319 X-Spam-Score: -3.12 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: i7aX04UwcWzv On Wed, Mar 10 2021, zimoun wrote: > Using the command =E2=80=9Cguix weather --display-missing=E2=80=9D at com= mit 6bed29b, I > identify 180 packages ghc-* which are missing. Then I locally rebuild > all of them and they build successfully. The only one broken is: > > ghc-haddock > > Therefore, is it possible to =E2=80=9Crestart=E2=80=9D the build on Cuira= ss of these 179 > ghc-* packages? It could be nice to have substitutes for the next > release. > > And if someone is in the mood to check why ghc-haddock is broken. :-) This was an issue with upstream[1], it has since been fixed but the releases that include the fix are only built for GHC 8.8 or later. Maybe its time to update to a newer Stackage LTS release? :) [1]: https://github.com/haskell/haddock/issues/850